jonathon
(284 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:22 PM
Original message |
Let's wait to see what Kucinich say's tomorrow - |
|
If they got to him....then, I don't hold out any hope at all for this political system.
And, I am so done with this whole game.
|
leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:24 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It's all been theater. We just needed some vampires and bomb diffusers |
AnOhioan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:24 PM
Response to Original message |
2. If Dennis caved without getting something in return.... |
quiller4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:25 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I don't know who you mean by "they" but I sure hope Dennis is |
|
a "yes" vote. I know that many of his friends and supports from Labor in Ohio have called to try and convince him today.
|
SemiCharmedQuark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Probably the freemasons. |
|
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 09:29 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
The same "they" that made Elliot Spitzer use prostitutes, "Johnny" Edwards cheat on his cancer stricken wife and Eric Massa grope his aides.
|
msanthrope
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
13. Nah--the trilateral commission. n/t |
AnOhioan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Funny...I called to thank him for standing up for the people |
Ozymanithrax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:30 PM
Response to Original message |
6. From all reports, Kucinich finally decided to become a true progressive... |
|
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 09:30 PM by Ozymanithrax
and vote for a progrssive bill.
|
AnOhioan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. LOL Thanks for the laugh |
|
Unless this bill ends up containing a public option, it is nothing more than an insurance company enrichment program. And, if it passes, the Dems have become lil better than the Repubs...and I shall vote accordingly.
|
Ozymanithrax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Clearly, Kucinich and now about evey other elect progressive... |
|
do not accept that premise.
The people voting against it are all blue dogs and Goppers.
|
AnOhioan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
14. Dennis has not said either way...tomorrow he will say |
|
And I am betting that if he is voting yes, it means that he fought for and got something to make a bad bill palatable.
|
jonathon
(284 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. Maybe the ERISA changes to allow states to do single payer without being sued by insurance companies |
|
If the amendment is in the bill, it would allow states to do single payer -
Wait and see.
|
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
21. How can the states do this? |
|
Even the ones who might want to are so strapped for cash they're cutting services of all kinds to the bone.
State by state would be better than nothing but it would sure suck to live in one the states that would be among the last to finally, if ever, do it.
If Obama was so hell bent on saving the insurance companies he could have pushed a model like Hawaii's. The private insurers are still in the game there, but well regulated and, because most the population is insured, the rates are some of the lowest in the country.
|
Ozymanithrax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
18. If he got someting even better added to the bill that is great. |
jonathon
(284 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. Oh give me a break. Now this is a progressive bill? |
|
The health insurance wetdream and mafiaoso drug company bill is a progressve bill, now.
DU has officially lost its mind.
|
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
15. Compared to standing still it is. It's moving forward. The next step |
|
is a public option, but this helps in the meantime.
|
twitomy
(756 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
17. You obviously havent figured gotten the memo: |
|
Pile 'O Shit = BAD!!
Pile 'O Shit(D) = GOOD!
|
AnOhioan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
19. Ain't it the unfortunate truth +1 |
Ozymanithrax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
20. No, a bill that brigns health care to 30 million, increases the number of people ... |
|
avaialbe to get Medicaide, a bill that ends the refusal of health care due ot pre-existing conditions, and many other things is a good bill becaue it helps real people. If Kucinich votes for he, he will show that he is a man of principal who puts the people first.
|
rpannier
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. Apparently that's not true |
|
...a bill that ends the refusal of health care due to pre-existing conditions...
If I read the bill correctly (and Rep Phil Hare's Office Confirmed it is true) then it fines insurance companies for refusing to insure someone with a pre-existing condition. If caring for the person costs 50,000 dollars and the fine is less then the care, then it is cheaper for the insurance companies to pay the fine.
So it doesn't prevent them from doing so. The fine is minimal
|
twitomy
(756 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-17-10 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
23. And one thing I have wondered about |
|
The bill says you cant refuse coverage due to pre-exisiting conditions.
But I hear nothing on the price.
Result,
Insurance Agent: "Sure you can get insurance even though you have cancer, aftera ll its the law, but your rate will be 10x higer"
Gee some improvement....
|
greenbird
(432 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-17-10 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
why the insurance and drug companies are fighting this so hard if this is their "wetdream" (I didn't think that was one word, but you learn something every day).
|
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Either he's satisfied his conditions have been met - or he's been pressured to vote YEA in return for "future considerations".
I don't think he's going to cave for anyone.
|
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:36 PM
Response to Original message |
11. It's quite possible that he's been hearing from his constituents, |
|
like my relatives out there, that they WANT him to vote yes.
|
apocalypsehow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-16-10 09:36 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I hear that Greyhound comin' round the bend again. Damn that driver must be plumb tuckered out. n/t. |
sufrommich
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-17-10 05:45 AM
Response to Original message |
25. Kucinich is a politician , politicians have to answer to the |
|
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 05:45 AM by sufrommich
people they represent. All politics is local, he doesn't represent the progressives of the US as much as he represents the people of Ohio. He would have had a tough time voting against this bill in depressed state like Ohio and still win the next election. That's what politicians do.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:55 PM
Response to Original message |