Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If people can't afford an insurance premium and must be subsidized...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:31 PM
Original message
If people can't afford an insurance premium and must be subsidized...
How are they suppose to afford the copay and deductible? I have good insurance and would still struggle if any illness struck.
The deductibles and copays are the real killers... and if you can't pay them no insurance policy in the world will help.
Plus, many good policies are only 80% coverage for anything major - even with a insurance... a $5000 ER bill hits HARD.

No annual limits, No lifetime limits, and no preexisting condition screening allowed by law...
The deductible on such policies is going to be scary.
This bill won't solve anything. It will bankrupt people forced to buy insurance but who cannot afford to USE the insurance.
At best, general preventative checkups become affrodable. Just hope they don't actually find a problem. :eyes:

Health Insurance =/= Health Care
Having Health Insurance =/= Having Access to Health Care
You've got to be able to AFFORD to USE your insurance to benefit from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. At this time, I cannot afford the cost OR the fines, never mind actually USING it.
I'm about to be raped by my own party. I wish I had options.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Some cannot afford to take time off from work to get to a doctor to begin with
We are not addressing reality with this 'reform', are we?

How many middle class bankruptcies due to medical care costs? And lots of those folks had insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. That is so true!
I never leave work for a doctors appointment or dentist appointment unless it is something really dire. If I miss time at work I have to make the time up so doctor appointments have to happen during vacation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. It doesn't matter what you think. The fix is in
4 decades of lobbyists fighting for this, and now it has come to pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
52. Yes. This fix was in long before most of us realize. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. The co-pay and deductible is turned over to the credit bureau
But at least you get to see the doctor when you're sick. And you get free preventative check-ups.

If you don't want that, don't use it. Let the rest of us get the only health care we have a prayer of getting in our lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yes all of you being sent to the poor house or worse. Eat shit and die.
You must sacrifice so others can get theirs.

Never the other way around. We wouldn't want the I"m getting mine folks to say "not unless the least of us get what I get". That's unamerican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. The least of us are getting Medicaid.
The slightly-above-the-least are getting subsidized insurance they can't afford to use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
37. Medicaid...
As Medicaid Payments Shrink, Patients Are Abandoned
By KEVIN SACK
Published: March 15, 2010

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/16/health/policy/16medicaid.html


States Consider Medicaid Cuts as Use Grows
By KEVIN SACK and ROBERT PEAR
Published: February 18, 2010

... A survey released Thursday by the Kaiser Family Foundation found a record one-year increase in Medicaid enrollment of 3.3 million from June 2008 to June 2009, a period when the unemployment rate rose by 4 percentage points. Total enrollment jumped 7.5 percent, to 46.9 million, and 13 states had double-digit increases.

Because Medicaid enrollment often lags behind unemployment, this year’s increase could prove even greater.

The options are limited by several realities. To qualify for Medicaid dollars provided in the stimulus package, states agreed not to tighten eligibility for low-income people. And any time a state cuts spending on Medicaid, it loses at least that much in federal matching money.

Despite the ban on restricting eligibility, hard-hit states like California and Arizona are considering proposals by their governors that would remove hundreds of thousands from the rolls once the federal financing ends. Gov. Jan Brewer of Arizona, a Republican, has called for eliminating Medicaid coverage for 310,000 childless adults and ending the Children’s Health Insurance Program to help close a two-year budget gap of about $4.5 billion.

Gov. Phil Bredesen of Tennessee, a Democrat, is proposing the largest cuts in the history of TennCare, his state’s Medicaid program. To trim 9 percent of the TennCare budget, he would establish a $10,000 cap on inpatient hospital services for nonpregnant adults and would limit coverage of X-rays, laboratory services and doctor’s office visits.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/19/us/politics/19medicaid.html


30% of doctors don't take it or aren't taking new patients, over 40% of specialists. Waiting times are up to 4 months in some states to see a doctor. Medicaid is a purposely underfunded disaster. The long term unemployed number over 6 million. An additional at least 15 million under the income level americans are estimated to enroll. That number is a low ball estimate. Add them to the almost 60 million on medicaid today.

It's a massive dumping ground for the poor. Approved of by the ever pandered to middle class that has a history of not giving a shit when medicaid was systematically cut to the bone. The poor must sacrifice so the middle class can get theirs. The mantra of the new conservative liberal and just another version of the 30 year old right wing bootstrap meme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. I'm in AZ, unemployed, and supposedly eligible for Medicaid.
I applied but my friend who works for AHCCCS (our Medicaid system) says they've shut off new enrollments even though they're technically not supposed to. We're that broke. And the Medicaid expansion in the HCR bill (which is theoretically a good thing) will only fund 80% of it in the states. Arizona absolutely cannot afford hundreds of millions in an unfunded mandate, no matter how worthy a goal extending coverage to more low income people is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #38
49. They can't shut off Medicaid enrollments
Get a lawyer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #49
62. You don't understand AZ.
Just because something is illegal doesn't mean anything, the various AG's simply "decline to prosecute" when the state or big money is involved.

This is the state that major corporations have repeatedly told was not suitable, no matter how many tax breaks they give, because we have no educated workforce. For decades we've rank in the basement in education spending and results, so we get "charter schools" (churches sucking the education budget dry) and deep cuts for public schools.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. That's why there are lawyers
She needs to get one -- the way we do when we need to defend our rights in blue states. Do you think everything just operates perfectly in blue states? No. We fight when things aren't right, over and over and over again.

And we have charter schools too. Some great ones that are doing things like foreign language and cultural immersion, arts, science, etc. We've got them even in good districts, because it seemed like a good idea to introduce some new educational models and learn from them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. But you're not getting HEALTH CARE.
You're getting health insurance. There is a finite difference.

Doctor visits and regular check-ups could be handled without exploiting every american into paying insurance companies.
Open free clinics and provide free care to people at or under 150% poverty threshold & reduced cost care for other patrons.

Trust me, this isn't the health CARE you've been praying for your entire lifetime. Insurance is a scam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
48. Cured Hepatits C, diabetes, heart, back
How much health care would you like to have?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. The preventative checkups don't help much
when you can't afford to follow up on them if something is found. Your credit bureaus comment doesn't make sense either, because most doctor's offices simply do not provide service PERIOD unless you have the co-pay up front. I suppose hospitals and emergency rooms could report you to the credit bureaus, but that's how it is NOW...so what's the difference?

As for your rather sickening last comment, allow me to translate that into plainer language: "I got mine. Tough shit for you."

Welcome to the NEW Democratic Party, ladies and gentlemen--as represented above. Jesus effing wept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
47. But you can follow it up
As I said below, this horrible terrible SUBSIDIZED INSURANCE cured by husband's Hep C, pays for all of his heart medication, has helped get his diabetes under control, and has paid for several procedures to try to treat his back pain.

Yes there is an occasional co-pay turned over to a credit bureau, but since the insurance pays the majority of the bill, THEY KEEP SEEING HIM.

Most of the time, they just write off the portion we can't pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #47
57. My doctor's office will no longer even see you if you don't provide the copay up front.
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 03:58 PM by Occulus
They have a big, big sign stating as much right when you walk in the door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Did you just lose that good coverage you've bragged about having here?
I don't know what you're doing with this "only health care we have a prayer of getting" stuff but people on DU have memories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
43. Nope. I still have it
And I'm still going to the doctor and so is my husband. His Hep 3 is cured, his heart is in great shape, his diabetes is at normal levels. I'm thrilled beyond words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
35. Oh, right. The part you can't pay is turned over to the credit bureau and what?
Do you think it just goes away? They get a judgment against you and garnish your wages. The last I heard, they could take up to 25% of gross wages to satisfy a judgment. Not only that, but most doctors want money up front for office calls if your insurance won't cover the visit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #35
45. Get a bettter doctor
The clinic here takes everybody, money or not. Maybe you better make your nonprofits in Arkansas do the same.

Do you know Baptist is a nonprofit? It is. They sure don't act like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleobulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
41. So now you have debt collection agencies on your back, and you declare bankruptcy...
Problem solved, right? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. No you don't.
Anybody at the bottom of the pile knows better. And being able to get medical care is worth working out a $100 payment plan here and there. A damn site better than dying, which is all any of you are offering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleobulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #44
53. Oh please, I have to pay for my MRI before I can even get surgery...
and then I have to come up with the money for that, so, using the deduct offered by my insurance, I'd have to pay 100 extra dollars I don't have for 20 months before I can even get treated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. Oh please. I have a $500 deductible
Because the subsidy pays enough of the premium that I can afford to do that. If I'm sick enough to need an MRI, the $500 deductible has been ate up long before the MRI rolls around. If you're being charged for an MRI instead of your insurance, then you either need a different hospital or a different insurance company.

One of my sons walked around with an injured back for months because he had no health insurance and we couldn't afford a $500 visit to a doctor or an $800 MRI. With our insurance, my husband hasn't had to go through that and has gotten all kinds of treatments to try and resolve his disc and arthritis issues. I know the difference between insurance and NOTHING and I'll take insurance every single time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleobulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #55
61. My employer offers a deduct that's 4 times that, with a 5,000 dollar maximum...
annual out of pocket expense. Making 10 bucks an hour, I simply cannot afford to pay that. Its great that you are so lucky with your insurance, not all of us are that lucky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
51. "If you don't want that, don't use it"
Well I wouldn't except it's FUCKING MANDATORY. Or are you saying I should be forced to pay a premium and not be able to use the "insurance" and that is an improvement over the old system? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

And BTW you aren't getting "health care" you are getting insurance.


Normally I have to go to Freeperville to see the level of "I got mine, fuck you" I have been seeing on DU today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. It doesn't matter.
The point of this bill was to keep the insurance companies going by handing them a group of "mandated" customer and transfering billions of tax money into their pockets in the form of premium subsidies.

This bill was never meant to actually improve Americans' access to care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. And it is also a gimme to Wall Street. Insurance Companies play the casino
They do NOT put our premiums in a coffee can in their offices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. One good anaolgy is GIVING a very poor person a house...
It won't save them poverty or from homelessness. To live a house they still have to pay for taxes, utilities, and upkeep.
They'll be back on the street twice as poor as ever.
They need a program that would give them shelter/housing with ALL the costs accounted for or controlled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. I was thinking in the same terms only using a car.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. guess what? looks like the public option is IN
and I doubt they will make poor patients pay high deductibles. What's the motive? It's NON PROFIT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. If there is no verbatim restriction on high deductibles and copays...
You can bet your ass it will be happening EVERYWHERE.
Not only that, but every loohole in the document is going to be handling more traffic than the Brooklyn Bridge.

Non-Profit :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. big if--can you wait a few days to rain on the democracy parade? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. This bill will pass, with THAT problem. And when it becomes apparent that
large numbers of people are STILL going without medical CARE, or are being bankrupted by medical CARE, there will be added impetus to the drive for single payer.

That's how I see this playing out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. yeah that really worked out well with NAFTA didnt it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Apples and oranges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. you're overlooking a HUGE factor though. This is a DEMOCRAT bill.
If there enough problems AFTER this bill is implemented that major HCR needs revisted again - then democrats lose.
Good luck getting the much needed fixes without democrats in power.
All the republicans need to say is "We told you so. We tried to save you guys from this."

Game over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. double post (n/t)
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 01:17 PM by OneTenthofOnePercent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
40. No, this bill was meant to lock the insurance companies firmly into place.
The problems you mention are the reason national healthcare became such a huge issue in the first place. The Obama Administration essentially stepped in and rescued the insurance industry by grafting it onto the government, just as the crisis they created was threatening to destroy them.

Very similar to the bank bailouts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
19. Question, are any of you going to SHUT UP after the bill passes?
No? Neither will I. So, they are hounded to speed things up, make them more inclusive and promoting early detection and preventative care.

Lets roll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. LOL, yes, it's worked so well for NAFTA and the Iraq Invasion?
Nothing can go wrong here too? :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. HCR aint nafta. Not even close. Nafta nibbles at us. HC is an immediate need, and always will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. The result will be THE SAME. The poltical elites will NOT act and we will be stuck with
mandates and absolute servatude to the Insurance Cartel. Many of us will go bankrupt if we get dx with Cancer or get into a bad accident.

Congrats for making even more people die and/or go into debt.

"The road to Hell is paved with good intentions."

We'll all be part of the abject poor thanks to the Insurance Cartel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. As of now, I cannot ever work again, cannot get HC ins, was turned down for SS dis
The fight ever goes on. Must I youtube Teddy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. Yes, we could opt to go bankrupt like many. Heaven knows the cost will not be contained ...
without, at a minimum, a robust public option.

Be careful what you wish for? Abso-fucking-lutely!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. "Abso-fucking-lutely!" - best line in Sex In the City. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. i have coverage from hubby's employer. they
cover him for free, but i pay $121 a month for my coverage. however, we are both subjected to co-pays and deductibles that go up every year. our deductible for this year is $900 for each of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. It's going to go up again and again. We'll be bled dry before any of the meaningful
changes for working class Americans will take effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. i agree. i've been eligible for
medicare for a few years, but hubby's plan is better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
32. yep, and I'm uncomfortable with subsidies WITHOUT price controls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
34. Ignoring the death spiral effect of current coverage
I'm not thrilled that we're getting only a start, but I'm more than a little dismayed to see so many people either ignorant or willfully ignoring one of the problems with the current system and how mandated coverage can and should actually help. It isn't complicated--when buying insurance is expensive, healthy people are less likely to opt-in. This skews the pool of insured people toward those with illness, this causes the rates to rise. The rising rates tip the scales even further until eventually, only the people with catastrophic/chronic illness would continue to pay the premiums.
Mandating coverage averages out the pool. Is it the only or even the best cost containment strategy, obviously not. However, those that say mandates are not part of the solution are not being honest. I would prefer government run single payer, but that requires a mandate too, funded most likely by withholding taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. 86% of Americans have coverage now. Are they all in poor health? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #39
54. Not 86% of the self-employed/unemployed
Most people are currently insured in mandated circumstances, i.e., their employer MUST cover everyone (or not provide insurance). Another chunk of the 86% are on medicare (again, not optional).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #54
59. The only mandatory health coverage in existence today is on members of the military.
No one is forced to accept insurance from their work or sign up for Medicare/Medicaid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #59
63. Sure, you're not forced to use it
But I'm pretty sure no one asked if I wanted medicare/medicade costs coming out of my check. Likewise, refusing insurance at most places that offer it as a benefit doesn't mean that you get more money, so in effect, you're still paying. It is common for some businesses no to ask a small contribution toward insurance, but I've never heard of the employer's contribution being returned to the employee. Also, most employer plans must sign up a significant percentage of the workforce to get competitive rates and to qualify for tax breaks.

Anyway, this is all semantic games. The reality is that for insurance to work, its costs to be spread around and the risks assumed somewhat equally--otherwise it simply becomes a personal medical savings account, i.e., pay as you go. I'd personally like to see insurance become optional the government take over the providing of basic healthcare. However, that would be essentially universally mandated insurance. The only difference (and it is a huge difference) is that the government would be non-profit.

There are tons of things wrong with our health care system, insurance is just a part. This bill doesn't even pretend to fix all of healthcare, it doesn't even attempt to fix insurance much. However, it is trying to get coverage to many of the 14% that don't have it. Doing that without a mandate is sadly, not realistic. That the mandate isn't coupled with a nationalization of the insurance industry is a shame, but it doesn't change the economic factors that make mandates inevitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #34
50. Mandated health insurance can & will help the insurance & hospital industries
Us? not so much. A public option would have provided this basis for improvement we keep hearing about. Without it you guys will spend the next 30 years fighting to change it. Me? I'll be here for part of it but I'm old and won't make it for 30 more. There were options between this and single payer.

Too bad we didn't have anyone who ran on a plan to give people a choice to buy into a public plan.

oh...wait...WTH happened to that guy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
36. It depends. I had subsidized ins for a while, was very appreciative of it
Co pay of $15 to see a doc in the clinic was fine with me. When I had surgery, it cost me a couple thousand, which was difficult to come up with. But without insurance, it would have been much much much more.

I do hope you aren't saying that because I had difficulty paying the $2000 deductible, that I should not have any insurance coverage at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleobulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. Its not just deducts its also maximum out of pocket...
For the insurance offered at my work, its 5,000 dollars, considering I need surgery, I can't afford that, so I do without. I can't afford the premiums, even after HCR even if my premiums are subsidized, I'd still do without. I'll be insured on paper, but not in practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #42
56. You won't have to have a $5,000 deductible
You'll be able to afford a better plan when your premium is subsidized. And, iirc, I don't think they're going to be able to charge that kind of deductible anymore either. Yes the out of pocket will probably still be too high, but once everybody is in this system, we'll have more moderate income people to get together and scream about these things. If we just leave it the way it is, there will be no hope to make the system any better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleobulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. No I won't, because that is what my employer offers...
hence I would have to accept it, by law. In addition, that 5,000 dollars maximum out of pocket, the deduct is 2,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #42
65. Now that I am paying for insurance, that is what I have also, thinking of it as catastrophic vs usea
useable. I find it odd that my state subsidized insurance (WA) made it more likely I was able to use it where my private insurance makes it less likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
46. It's supposed to enrich the insurance companies, not get health care to poor people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitty Herder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
60. That is what I keep thinking about, too.
We need meaningful healthCARE reform, not an insurance-care bill. But how do we get there from here? This is the best chance we're likely to have for a generation. And it's been blown. Healthcare won't come up again for years. And in the meantime, how many people will die because they can't afford care even with insurance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC