Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama: "I'm a fourth-quarter player."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:04 PM
Original message
Obama: "I'm a fourth-quarter player."

The U.S. ambassador to Canada, David Jacobson, a friend of Barack Obama's from Chicago, is fond of quoting the U.S. president saying of himself: "I'm a fourth-quarter player."

Well, in the great American health-care debate, it is very late in the fourth quarter, and about time Obama got into the game as he has in the last week, hitting the campaign trail, ditching his teleprompter, taking off his jacket, rolling up his sleeves, and returning to the ringing rhetoric that took him to the White House.

Rather than talking over the heads of the American people, as he has for the last year, he's asking them to send a message to Washington: We want health reform now.


http://www.montrealgazette.com/health/fourth+quarter+Obama+finally+comes+play/2691132/story.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. The team captain should have had his head in the game for the prior three quarters.
Instead he benched himself for almost a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He was practicing his sloganeering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I dunno, it allows everybody to thrash it out.
And people get to vent and be heard and all that, then when the crunch comes, and everybody's sick of hearing about it, he steps in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. There are a lot of irons in the fire, and he gets slammed for spending ALL his time on HCR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Well it's what people concentrate on.
In the meantime he's had a lot of other things going on, the economy, education, immigration, Iran, Israel and so on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. And when he came in he pointed his team at the wrong goal posts. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Number 21 Barak Obama coming in at QB for the Big Pharma and
Insurance Industry Wildcats! Go Team Go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yeahyeah Donating Member (741 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. So we have to wait til 2013 for change?Or 2016-2017?Or 2013 and 2017?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Imagine what we might have gotten if he'd begun playing in the
first quarter instead of trading off actual health reform for insurance reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I think that he got exactly what he wanted
he just had to wear us all down first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. That's 'trading off actual health reform for insurance subsidies.' nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. So he wasted a year of our time to wait for the "forth quarter"?
I guess the insurance industry really must have made that worth his while. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. There is a necessary process. You cannot just cut out all the parts you dont like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Why not? It worked for the Senate
The Senate did nothing but cut out the parts they and their industry campaign contributors didn't like. It was their one contribution to the whole process.

Oh, wait, you meant cutting out parts that aren't good for the American people.

Well, yeah, you cannot do that sort of thing. It would be total madness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. We do what we must, whenever we must. ad infinitum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well, when the star player doesn't contribute for 3 quarters he makes it more
difficult for the rest of his team. In the meantime the other team is running up the points and making your team look feckless. If that was his strategy, then it was stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. He made it a win-win for the Repukes...if it passes, they blame
the Dems come mid-terms for the still high cost of healthcare, if it doesn't pass, the media paints it as Obama can't get legislation passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Who gives a shit what the repukes will do. They dont DO anything, just complain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
15. Yeah-while he plays for the corrupt corporation team.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BakedAtAMileHigh Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
18. So Are the Washington Generals
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. It's easier to throw a game in the fourth quarter
Once you know the score, you can decide whether or not you have to totally pooch it, or if the game is going poorly enough to let it slouch across the finish.

Luckily, the first three quarters were spent losing in earnest, so the fourth will work out just fine.

I'm sure the President is terribly relieved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
21. Ali called it "Rope-a-dope"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rope-a-dope

Rope-a-dope is a boxing fighting style commonly associated with Muhammad Ali (who coined the term) in the Rumble in the Jungle against George Foreman.
Technique

The rope-a-dope is performed by a boxer assuming a protected stance, in Ali's classic pose, lying against the ropes, and allowing his opponent to hit him, in the hope that the opponent will become tired and make mistakes which the boxer can exploit in a counterattack.

In competitive situations other than boxing, rope-a-dope is used to describe strategies in which one party purposely puts itself in what appears to be a losing position, attempting thereby to become the eventual victor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. The only "dopes" IMO are the people who don't believe that this is EXACTLY where
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 05:19 PM by ShortnFiery
the leadership of BOTH parties wanted to be at this point.

I honestly believe that this whole gyration, for the most part was CAREFULLY orchestrated between the parties, the insurance cartel and BigPharma.

We, the American People, are the DOPES if we genuinely believe that our vote counts for anything other than the players' jerseys for one big corporate duopoly TEAM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. It's not a sport, Mr. President.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
23. No, this "play" has been planned out for a long time in certain circles to include the
clutch containing The Administration, Insurance Cartel and BigPharma.

Everyone is playing their roles swimmingly as we approach The Last Act before the people are, once again, FINANCIALLY SCREWED.

Do you ever wonder what condescending things the political elites say about "the chattering classes?"

We got PLAYED again by both parties:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC