Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A question about the current version of Health Insurance Reform:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:20 PM
Original message
A question about the current version of Health Insurance Reform:
I understand that someone can choose to pay a fine rather than purchase insurance. If someone chooses to pay the fine and then needs an expensive medical service to live, what happens? Are they refused medical services? Does the money from fines go toward some sort of emergency care fund for uninsured Americans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. If someone pays the fine rather than get in the pool, they must pay cash
for their expensive medical service. They are not covered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So we just let them die?
Can this be officially called compassionate liberalism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yeah. The Death Panels take over!
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 03:40 PM by FrenchieCat
:sarcasm:


Actually, my understanding is that the $750 annual fine is in essence
bare catastrophic health insurance in one sense.

I haven't seen text that states that folks who are dying will be turned away,
as that is what the fine is for; a fine, that if I understand it correctly,
will also be subsidized for those who can't afford even the fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. The question isn't what the bill doesn't say, but what it
actually does say about this - are you saying that the fine absolutely provides catastrophic insurance? I don't mean your "my understanding" but specifically does it say this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. no, those rich bastards pay for themselves, just like they say they will!
The reason you CAN avoid the pool is because you have so much money you don't need it. They have the same thing with car insurance, even though it's "required:" if you don't need insurance becasue you can cover the damages you sign a waiver. No one who is poor will be forced to pay the fine or to go without treatment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. My question isn't about someone who is poor.
There are several threads that talk about a $10 per hour worker - if that $10 per hour worker (who isn't considered 'poor' since s/he will not get 100% subsidized care) chooses to pay the fine rather than get insurance, will s/he be able to get that vital medical care under this bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. $10/hr is poor.
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 04:05 PM by librechik
And we are all at a handicap trying to predict these things, becasue the final reconciliation bill won't be online till later today or tomorrow. So can we all just calm down? The bill will improve things for those who don't have an are wanting healthcare. That is inarguable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Their case would be the same as now: a hospital cannot legally turn them away from emergency care.
And the costs of their care will still ultimately be paid by the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. That's what I assumed, but I wanted to know if the bill
specifically addressed this question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Do you have the Bill's language for that, because I'd like to see it.
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 03:36 PM by FrenchieCat
Thanks! :hi:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. OK, do you have the bill's language that says what will
happen to an uninsured person under the bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. But you do realize that the bill contains information on those who can't pay
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 04:25 PM by LynneSin
There are alot of posts out there assuming that if you can't pay you're screwed and will be fine. What they fail to tell you is about provisions made for those who can't pay if the costs exceeds what they can afford.

It's just the death panels of DU trying to put one last scare into HCR. I think Prosense has a good post about how HCR affect the proverbial 'what if I make $10/hr and cant' afford to by insurance' question.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=7940136&mesg_id=7940136
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. With all respect, neither Prosense nor any of the responses
answer the question.

Again, I'm not asking about the people who are deemed poor enough to either get the insurance for no cost or not be required to pay the fine. I am asking if anyone knows what the bill says about people who are considered to make enough money to pay all or a portion of their insurance premium, hence they need to pay a fine if they choose not to purchase insurance. If that person needs medical care they cannot afford, is there a mechanism in the bill that provides for their care or does it revert back to the current system?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC