Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Revealed: Ashcroft, Tenet, Rumsfeld warned 9/11 Commission about ‘line’ it ’should not cross’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:43 PM
Original message
Revealed: Ashcroft, Tenet, Rumsfeld warned 9/11 Commission about ‘line’ it ’should not cross’
Revealed: Ashcroft, Tenet, Rumsfeld warned 9/11 Commission about ‘line’ it ’should not cross’

http://rawstory.com/2010/03/revealed-ashcroft-tenet-rumsfeld-warned-911-commission-line-should-cross/

By Sahil Kapur
Wednesday, March 17th, 2010 -- 9:11 am

Senior Bush administration officials sternly cautioned the 9/11 Commission against probing too deeply into the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, according to a document recently obtained by the ACLU.

The notification came in a letter dated January 6, 2004, addressed by Attorney General John Ashcroft, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and CIA Director George J. Tenet. The ACLU described it as a fax sent by David Addington, then-counsel to former vice president Dick Cheney.

In the message, the officials denied the bipartisan commission's request to question terrorist detainees, informing its two senior-most members that doing so would "cross" a "line" and obstruct the administration's ability to protect the nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. And somehow, that didn't raise a red flag for any of the idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. How much more of this crap are we going to have to take?
...doing so would "cross" a "line" and obstruct the administration's ability to protect the nation.

"Protect the nation?" Fuck you, neo-cons! You have no desire to "protect the nation." You're only protecting yourselves!

Bring these sons-of-bitches up on charges of treason and murdering 3,000 Americans...NOW!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. 7000+
iraq, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. We need a different President, first.
This one refuses to help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
axollot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Refuses to or unable? The jury is still out on that - it sure seems
like someone put a gun metaphorically to his head after inauguration. The Establishment wins again.

Cheers
Sandy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. There IS that question.
But either way, we're not getting what we need from his time in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
axollot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. And that is the saddest part. One can hope history tells it correctly.
But if TX continues to flood our school system with their textbooks then the working class of this country will be doomed. Thom Hartmann talked about these kids not being prepared for college science - imagine how unprepared on the global stage we'll be?!

Cheers
Sandy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. guilty as fuck they are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Have we ever gotten any intel from these prisoners on 9/11?
Or was the point just to have prisoners who could be labeled as 9/11 plotters, then keep them incommunicado so we'd never know the truth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grand Taurean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Of course there was a cover-up.
Bush and company are filth with their dirty hands in every criminal cesspool known.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubledamerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. What would DUers say if this was happening in, for example, Colombia? "of course"
Organized crime + military coups can't happen here. America is exempted from history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. They should hang those men on tv.
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 10:29 PM by Major Hogwash
Oh, they'll have a trial first, alrighty.
A fair trial.
Then we'll hang them.

Batches?
We don't need no stinkin' batches!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
10. Such obvious guilt
and such deliberate denial.

You want terrorists -- look no further than Ashcroft, Tenet, Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney, and Rove.

There's your FUCKING CRIMINALS folks, right there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. --
posted this yesterday morn and it got sent to the you know where.

important story and hard news at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. That's because...
...all the crazy truthers started weighing in. Tank gawd we aren't crazy truthers, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. 'Crazy' is denying what lengths some will go to ------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. Tampering with a federal investigation
In light of this information I'm going to predict they will be arrested, brought to trial and swiftly punished.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. PNAC - inside job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC