Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Co-pay, deductible, and premium cost...what stops them from skyrocketing?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:05 PM
Original message
Co-pay, deductible, and premium cost...what stops them from skyrocketing?

What, in this current health insurance "reform", keeps the cost of these at affordable levels?

At what level of income is a person eligible for subsidization?


----


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's why Obama wants a PO - to keep the insurance companies honest
:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He does?

I missed that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. But...but...he SAID
And the insurance reforms that I've already mentioned would do just that. But an additional step we can take to keep insurance companies honest is by making a not-for-profit public option available in the insurance exchange.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/remarks-by-the-president-to-a-joint-session-of-congress-on-health-care/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. KEYWORD: "said"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. oh
what a surprise!

NOT

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. The charity and goodwill of those honest corporate insurance companies
I think Im going to be sick.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Me too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Pagin public option
anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lil Missy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. What's stopping them now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. The fact that people can opt out of the insurance market..
and pay out of pocket, travel to foreign pharmacies and clinics or do without care.

Which is why taking that control away via mandates is insanely irresponsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lil Missy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #11
31. That's the republican position, but it doesn't help people who CANNOT AFFORD INSURANCE, nor
do they have the funds to travel to foreign clinics and pharmacies. Jeezus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
latebloomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Apparently, nothing
There was no regulation on their insatiable greed now, and there will continue to be none.

We're not allowed to rile up the insurance companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. Same sort of thing that's stopped them from skyrocketing in states that have regulatory power
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 10:19 PM by depakid
Like say, California and Oregon.

Not sure what the exact levels of income are (there's a formula for that) but my understanding is that subsidization is limited to high deductible, high copay plans with provisos for some limited, up front utilization for preventative care and screenings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. The Health Insurance Rate Authority stops them! Oh damn. It's been yanked from the bill.

Who would have thunk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. People up to 133% of FPL will be eligible for Medicaid
After that there will be subsidies to for people who are at up to 400% of FPL. Subsidies start at the lower income levels to limit people to paying not more than 3% of their income for premiums and regress up the income scale to those at 400% of FPL who will be limited to paying 9.8% of their income. After that a person is responsible for the entire premium. If the premium exceeds 17% of their income they will be given a waiver so they will not be fined for failing to obtain insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Will the IRS be the enforcer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. yes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. That doesn't answer the OP question at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. Yep. Good luck in their hunt to find a doctor who will see them n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luciferous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
35. That doesn't mean that we are stopping costs from skyrocketing though.
All that means is that the government is subsidizing skyrocketing costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. oh crap du`s expert on the healthcare bill must be posting somewhere else tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. Plans in the exchange will have limits on deductibles and out-of-pocket costs.
You'll be eligible for sliding-scale subsidies up to 400% of the Federal Poverty Line.

As for premium increases, I'm pretty sure they'll have to get approval from some regulatory official.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. What if you choose to retire...
...at 55?

What if your income is "optionally" lower?


----
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. No, they won't have to get approval from some regulatory agency
That was not in the bill at all. Diane Feinstein did introduce a bill to give HHS authority to evaluate and decide on requested premium increases but that was shot down by the Senate parlimentarian today as being undoable under reconciliation.

As for the limits on out of pocket costs and deductibles for the bronze plan (which is the one people will get with the subsidies), they are:

Actuarial value: 60%
Deductible: $2000
Out of pocket maximum: $5000 individual; $11,900 for family plans

There is no subsidy for these costs, just for the premium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Then I sit corrected.
That Bronze plan doesn't look too attractive. I wonder what the premiums will be for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Premiums for the bronze plan will depend, like all the others. on age and a couple of other factors
like smoking. The subsidies will depend on your income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. Subsidies don't stop premiums from rising, and don't cover the full ammount.
So what part of that is an answer to the OP question?

In fact, subsidies would only encourage insurance companies to raise rates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luciferous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. Exactly. If the government is willing to shell out for this, why wouldn't they take advantage of it?
It's a massive giveaway to insurance companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. i think they have to return a particular percentage of premiums as claim payments
so no matter what the contruct is in terms of copays, deductibles, premiums, and whatever else they concoct, they can only keep a certain percentage.

of course, the entire pie can get much larger, but their percentage is still limited.

meaning, despite copays and deductibles, they still have to pay 85% (or whatever the number is) of premiums out in claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. The MLR of 85% is an easily manipulated level
20 years ago the average MLR (without any regulations) was over 90%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ean Juan Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. People with employer insurance should expect savings of $0-300 per year
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 11:24 PM by Ean Juan
In premiums. Most of those with individual insurance will see significant reductions in the premiums they pay, thanks to the subsidies.

Factcheck.org: "What CBO said (see Table 1) is that for those who are in group policies, there would be no significant change in premiums, compared with what would be paid under current law. For those in large groups, there would be somewhere between no change at all and a 3 percent decrease in premium cost. For small groups, the change could fall between a 1 percent increase and a 2 percent decrease.
The only significant increases would be seen by those who buy their policies individually, CBO said. For those persons, the average premium per person would be between 10 percent and 13 percent higher."

http://factcheck.org/2010/02/health-care-summit-squabbles/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Uh-huh
Once again the self employed get the shaft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
29. nothing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
30. nothing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitsune Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
32. Nothing. That's the way they want it.
And the insurance mafia always gets what it pays for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
34. nothing.
they will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
36. Free market competition!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC