Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

California considers smoking ban at all state parks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 10:05 AM
Original message
California considers smoking ban at all state parks
California considers smoking ban at all state parks


SACRAMENTO, CA (AP) -- California lawmakers are considering what is believed to be the nation's most far-reaching smoking ban in state parks.

Under a bill being considered Thursday, smoking would be prohibited at state beaches and all other state parks.

Maine banned smoking at its state beaches last year. But groups that track such legislation say no state prohibits lighting up throughout its entire park system, as the California bill proposes.

The bill's author, Democratic state Sen. Jenny Oropeza of Long Beach, wants to get unsightly cigarette butts off the beach, eliminate second-hand smoke and reduce the threat of wildfires.

Campsites and parking areas would be exempted from the ban, which is opposed by the tobacco industry.

http://www.news10.net/news/story.aspx?storyid=77494&catid=2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wildfires--yeah, I can understand this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Prohibition is such a pretty siren. At first. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Prohibition is outlawing it everywhere...this is simply common sense...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Prohibition always starts with the "easy stuff"...
usually referred to as "common sense." You have an arc of prohibition developing with tobacco: first public places, next NEAR public places, next outdoors on public streets (at least 2 cities in Cali), next will be (in my estimation) bans in private residences in which children live (child protective bureaucracies are quite malleable in these matters), next outright bans and the corrupt smuggling which follows -- and is already increasing dramatically with cigarettes.

In a few years, we will be back here discussing the wisdom of this newest of prohibitions -- and it will be most "everywhere."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Is there absolutely nothing that should be prohibited?
Can I shit on your hamburger or piss in your drinking water? Should those acts be prohibited? The human being needs three things to sustain life. Food, water, and air. To you it is just fine to pollute my air but if I want to pollute your drinking water or your food...boy howdy..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm all in favor of anything that removes smoking from public areas - indoor and out
How nice to walk through parks without stupid ciggy butts all over the place or human beings spewing toxic cloouds in your face. The cars are bad enough, but having a lungful of concentrated blue chemical fog vented at you at face level is enough to make a person choke.

There are bigger problems in the world, but seeing this pass wouldn't hurt my feelings. It would probably save a few dollars on picking up the ciggy butts too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I see those cigarette butts at State Parks too
and so I have no problem with them banning smoking there. It's a fire hazard and an eyesore.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. If you live in L.A., secondhand smoke is the least of your worries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC