Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Condom requirement for porn film actors to be voted on in California

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 02:34 PM
Original message
Condom requirement for porn film actors to be voted on in California
Condom requirement for porn film actors to be voted on in California

State regulators are expected to vote Thursday on a petition asking them to require porn industry performers to use condoms and to take other safety measures. The six-member California Division of Occupational Safety and Health standards board appears likely to create an advisory committee to report back on whether the law should be changed and how it could be accomplished.

The board, appointed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, has up to six months to act on a Dec. 17, 2009 petition filed by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation that seeks to change state law to require safe-sex protections for adult-film workers, including mandatory condom use and more stringent safety training and testing for sexually transmitted diseases.

Earlier this month, staff members recommended that the board create an advisory committee to consider amending the law “in order to give greater protection to employees in the adult film industry.”

“It’s to study the issue more. If it merits it, they would formulate the language and bring it before the board,” to amend the law, said CAL/OSHA spokeswoman Erika Monterroza.

More:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/03/condom-requirement-for-porn-film-actors-comes-to-vote-in-california.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. !!
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gaedel Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Easier to pass laws than to fix the budget n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. You said it. This is a real waste of tax dollars.
I don't know how strict testing is for HIV and STDs, but let's be realistic - even if the safety regime for movie-making is bulletproof, people can still get diseases outside the workplace. There are better ways to get the message out, but in any case this is a complete waste of the legislature's time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. You mean OSHA doesn't cover this?
Damn. I had to wear steel-toed boots for shop work...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. The obvious question: Who has the job of monitoring the enforcement of this law?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yeah, like that'll be a hard job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damyank913 Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. It won't be that bad-it's the safety equipment that's a bitch...
Goggles, gloves, lotion...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. well, great, its not like they don't have a crisis meltdown budget thingy going on
so that they can devote time to this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. I hate to say it, but these are jobs that WILL leave the state if they pass the law.
They will start filming porno flicks just across the state line in AZ and NV, or else south of the border.

I actually have had a number of clients over the years who were in some aspect of the porn industry. They paid their bills the same as anybody else. And they, too, have fallen on hard times of late.......

Sigh. I know safety is important. I just have trouble with spending time and energy with this rather than fixing our serious problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The jobs will leave, so will the cost of treating HIV positive actors

You don't really believe the majority of porn actors have health care coverage, do you?

According to Sharon Mitchell, the director of the Adult Industry Medical Health Care Foundation, less than 5% have coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Guess what? They will continue to LIVE here. They will just travel elsewhere
to do the work, so the state they GO to will reap the tax benefits. We will be stuck with their HIV treatment costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. And if those states pass similar laws...?
I find "they will go elsewhere" for this.

They too have fallen on hard times? Was that meant as a pun? If so, I chuckled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damyank913 Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. Who says Americans don't manufacture anything anymore.
They want to "study" it more. Is that what they call it now-a-days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. aren't the actors regularly tested for HIV?
if so, what's the point? why not make everyone wrap themselves in saran wrap, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. Meh
I'm not into porn but I don't see why creators of it should be forced to turn their films into public service announcements. As a filmmaker, I prefer to avoid depictions of people smoking because I don't want to make it look cool, but this is completely a matter of individual choice and I wouldn't accept anyone telling me that I HAD to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC