Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ABC News admits paying $200,000 to accused murderer Casey Anthony

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 11:14 PM
Original message
ABC News admits paying $200,000 to accused murderer Casey Anthony
Source: Poynter Online

ABC News has admitted that it paid accused murderer Casey Anthony $200,000 in exchange for exclusive rights to video and photos. The network denies that the payments also included agreements for interviews.

The revelation came in a Orlando court hearing Thursday. The hearing was aimed at trying to determine if Anthony is broke and needs financial help to mount a defense.

The payments from ABC News were made in August 2008 while Casey Anthony was under investigation but not yet charged with the first-degree murder of her toddler, Caylee Anthony. A grand jury indicted the mother in October 2008.

ABC stations have repeatedly aired the images and video but have not, until now, revealed the long-rumored financial arrangement behind them. Anthony's lawyers told the judge about the ABC payment in a closed door hearing last fall. Thursday, the judge ordered the information be made public in open court.

Read more: http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=2&aid=179888
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. fuckin vampyres
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
O is 44 Donating Member (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. She wont see a penny of that
Her lawyers will take it all, so thats just less money the state will end up giving her defense team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I don't care who sees the penny, the fact that anyone would see a penny is gross
I've always said that I'm disgusted at the idea of privatized prisons because no one should legally capitalize on crime. Same with this scenerio...how in the hell do we as a society allow such crap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Im sorry, but until she's found guilty she's still considered innocent
I wouldnt be too quick to take that away from anyone, no matter what they might have done.

Thats not a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. guilty or innocent, a person is dead and this isn't entertainment.
I'm not taking anything from anyone accept the ability to capitalize on a potential crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Do you believe in innocent until proven guilty, or not?
Deny it to one, deny it to all.

I know she's accused of something horrific, but in our system she is not guilty just because she's accused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Ok hold on one minute
I'm not judging anyone guilty or innocent. Go back and read my posts...I simply don't think ANY PROFIT SHOULD BE MADE ON THIS. Regardless of who is innocent or who is guilty, is it a good idea for a network to pay for rights to this story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Im saying she wont profit, the state will in the end
They have to spend on an adequate defense, and when the prosecutor announced he was seeking the death penalty that automatically increases the cost of a defense 10x (on average).

That money wont ever touch her hands, the defense will take it and relieve the state of that much of the obligation they have in paying for an adequate defense.

Besides, if a person is only accused and not yet convicted how can anyone stop this kind of thing without violating their rights?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I'm saying that it's wrong regardless of who profits
I don't want ABC to pay anyone for this story. I honestly don't want anyone to profit off of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, what a scoop. What a great deal.
No dog vomit pictures available?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. What The F***???
A woman charged with murdering her child is NOT entertainment. What's next? Televising her entry into the colosseum? Nevermind. My life is probably better off if that question is never answered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. But some people would have you suspect otherwise!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. From what I gathered they are petitioning the court to continue
providing the same level of defense even though they ran out of money and she weren't financially capable of defending herself before it all happened.

At taxpayer expense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. Privatized prisons, Campaign funds for elected judges, and this crap
American justice has completely lost the plot. Even the DoJ is taking that statue a bit too literally - blindfolded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. exactly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Incitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
17. So how do Son of Sam laws come into play?
Can you make money from crimes you are accused of, but not yet convicted for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC