Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraq Election Result Hit by Fresh Delays

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 07:03 AM
Original message
Iraq Election Result Hit by Fresh Delays
Source: The Guardian

Iraq's electoral body said it would review all data in the recent general election, delaying yet again the declaration of a result that was expected and is thought to narrowly favour the coalition of the prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, over his secular rival, Iyad Allawi.

The review falls short of the full recount demanded by Maliki's State of Law bloc, but adds another layer of uncertainty to a painstaking 11-day count that has been riddled with delays and claims of vote rigging. It also follows conflicting accounts of who is the frontrunner, with Allawi's entourage still maintaining they are within striking distance of the lead, with 80% of the national vote counted.


"It will be close, believe me," Allawi said on the eve of the election. "This could take many months to sort out."

Ahead of what was expected to be a watershed in post-Saddam Iraq, the potential kingmakers gave the first indications of their demands during the horse-trading that will follow a winner being declared.

Loyalists of Moqtadr al-Sadr, the exiled Shia cleric, said they could countenance joining Maliki's coalition to form a government but only if the prime minister was not given a second term. The Sadrist bloc, which was ostracised by Maliki and denounced by the US as a spent force, has emerged from the ballot unscathed. It is likely to win up to 40 seats in the new 325-seat parliament, proving difficult to avoid in any coalition negotiations.

Before the election, the State of Law bloc had banked on enough seats to be able to ignore the Sadrist power base. Even after polling stations closed, Maliki's supporters were talking down Sadr's relevance.

more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/18/iraq-elections-results-delay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe that democracy thing isn't working in the Middle East.
Iraq was really a stupid idea. . As is Afghanistan. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. This should be very closely watched in the coming months.
Sadr is trying to get Maliki booted. The question will be whether this can be resolved politically or if the factions resort to violence. As the rhetoric heats up, so does the potential for an 'igniting moment'. An event could start a violent and expanding reaction.

If this were serious enough, the plans for US withdrawal will be delayed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. See Results here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC