Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When Business first foreign policy made us less secure: after fall of Soviet Union

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 09:40 AM
Original message
When Business first foreign policy made us less secure: after fall of Soviet Union
This probably occurred to someone else long ago, but I just realized our corporate profit above all foreign policy actually made us far less safe after the fall of the Soviet Union.

At the pivotal moment, we could have decided to pull Russia up to a European/American standard of living, rehabilitating a former enemy like we did with Japan and Germany.

Instead, we convinced them to do the neoliberal "shock-therapy," which probably filled a lot of pockets but also gave Russia Putin and the mafia economy.

A stable Euro-Russia would have no reason to attack the US, and would at worst be an economic competitor. Pushing them toward mafia Russia, we not only re-earned some of the Cold War distrust, but now some could probably go there and buy a nuke for a ham sandwich from a soldier who hasn't been paid in six months.

In this case, idealism and egalitarianism on human rights would also have been the pragmatic move for our security. Instead, our leaders sold us out to make their rich friends richer.

In the long run, this is why it's good for us that Latin America is shaking off the IMF & World Bank. When there people are doing well economically and feel like they control their own destinies and we aren't trying to keep them in grinding poverty, we have nothing to fear from them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Endless war and conflict is the goal of war profiteering robber barons.
Eisenhower did not do enough to stop the rise of the war economy profiteers when he was in office, but he did warn us when he left office how dangerous the profiteers were to our democracy. His warning went unheeded and now the criminal robber barons are in the driver's seat. Our country has been degraded, raped, and disgraced. I hope the People will wake up and retake control of our Nation.

http://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst306/documents/indust.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ike was more benign version of Baby Bush & Reagan: corporate employee
Posing as president. Speaking like that was probably one of the few things he did on defense or foreign policy that weren't dictated to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC