Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interesting article re: The Tuskegee Syphilis experiments : "Bad Blood in Tuskegee"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 10:24 AM
Original message
Interesting article re: The Tuskegee Syphilis experiments : "Bad Blood in Tuskegee"
Edited on Tue May-01-07 10:28 AM by Kingshakabobo
From: Damn Interesting

(don't read the 3rd comment if you don't want YOUR blood to go bad/boil)

http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=843

Early in the twentieth century, the medical community was practically helpless in its battle against syphilis. The crippling affliction was spreading at an alarming rate in certain areas, particularly among the poorer segments of the world population. Even for those who could afford medical care, the only known treatments rivaled the disease itself in the harm they did to sufferers.

In 1932, Dr. Taliaferro Clark from the United States Public Health Service (PHS) launched a study in Macon County, Alabama in order to document the progression of this troublesome sexually-transmitted disease. The region was home to hundreds of poor and mostly illiterate black farmers, and cases of syphilis had reached alarming proportions. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study was undertaken in the hopes that a deeper understanding of syphilis would provide new insights on potential treatments, and possibly justify a government-funded treatment program. But from these noble beginnings, a lack of funds and a shortage of ethics led to one of the most shameful clinical mishaps in US history.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> More @ link

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. The real shame of this study is that the autopsies
were so unnecessary, as were the longitudinal studies. They already knew from hundreds of years of observation how the disease progressed. Autopsies of patients who had died from it had already been done.

Human beings were not only condemned to a horrible, painful death, they were allowed to go about their business and infect wives, girlfriends, and any children born to these unions after a cure had come out.

Allowing the disease to progress before penicillin came on the scene instead of treating the subjects with mercury or arsenic, treatments that didn't make them non contagious and were at least as damaging as the disease, did no harm. Once penicillin came on the scene and was withheld, the study became a massive violation of medical ethics.

Every researcher who insisted on continuing that study by condemning human beings to an unnecessary and horrible death should have been in prison for crimes against humanity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "crimes against humanity" - agreed! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. A cautionary tale for all scientists with good intentions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC