Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SPYCAM: Long Philly Inquirer Summary Article

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 05:35 AM
Original message
SPYCAM: Long Philly Inquirer Summary Article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, this is interesting....
Joseph Daly, who retired in 2009 as Lower Merion police superintendent, said he never knew that his department was being furnished with pictures snapped from students' laptops.

"God, no, I don't remember that," he said when told about it. "That's illegal as hell."

Even if no laws were in fact broken, Daly said, it's still a terrible idea.

"A better plan would be: If you lose it, guess what - you owe the school a new computer," said Daly, now police chief in Springfield, Delaware County.


Interesting also that the company that bought out LANRev stopped the use of the webcam shots since they couldn't be used in court and they didn't make sense as a tracking mechanism (and probably also because it's illegal). What the hell was the point to having that feature since a) it doesn't tell you where the laptop is, and b) it can't be used in court anyway? There IS no point to it other than voyerism.


And in the Robbins' case it's clear they didn't use it to find a stolen or missing laptop, they used it to SPY - to catch the kid taking home a loaner computer.


Ugh.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. I have been saying this from the beginning. I worked for a state agency in PA
that wanted to monitor ALL PHONE CALLS from an entire hospital, the rationalle being so they could punish lower level employees using the phone for personal calls. I pointed out to them they would need several full time employees fot 3 shifts just to listen to all the phone messages, plus recording equipment, etc, (Not to mention I thought they were crazy) and they decided instead to install video/audio surveillance cameras through out the hospital supposedly for "safety" but actually to watch the staff.
Agencies LOVE this sort of thing, for whatever real reason - it gives them a feeling of power and control, and in this case lets them peek into kids bedrooms.


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neurotica Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. A well-written article that lays out the unintended consequences of poor
policy-/decision-making. The school district never thought things through and this mess is the result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm going to hold my tongue, too.
Some of us knew how wrong this was from the beginning, and knew what had happened. It had to have happened that way, given people's nature.

Hopefully, people have been informed about their rights now, and this won't ever happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. O.K. ... we should be hearing the ...
"I was wrong, and you guys were right"'s any minute now.;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC