Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

no president has had to endure a 24/7 'news' network dead-set on destroying him

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:13 AM
Original message
no president has had to endure a 24/7 'news' network dead-set on destroying him
that is the faux objective imho....destroy President Barack Obama.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. You got that right..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. I guess Bill Clinton doesn't exist.
:shrug: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. I think this is a double down effort from what Clinton endured
It was bad, but I don't recall it being this bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
22. It was bad. Lewinsky, Whitewater, Travelgate
the list goes on and on and the MSM was only too happy to parrot the talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. What year did that start? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
39. Travelgate was fabricated in '96
Edited on Sun Mar-21-10 12:37 PM by ixion
but the MSM was on Clinton from the get-go. Before FAUX there was HNN, which was more subtle, but the subtext was just as snarky.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/09/AR2010030903915.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #27
50. The Paula Jones circus started before 1994, her lawsuit filed early 94. "travelgate" investigated 94
Whole Congressional fucking hearings devoted to the investigation in 95. The firing of the old White House Travel office personnel, who were so managerially incompetent that their records could not even be audited, happened in Spring of 93 right after the Clinton Inauguration. The squealing began immediately on all these things, first on AM radio propaganda networks. Then Congress changed hands in 94 and the Republicans didn't waste a second before trying to gin up a scandal with which to impeach Bill Clinton. With Congress now devoted to impeaching Bill Clinton or his cabinet officers or staffers, the MSM could come along for the ride, because official action on the "matters" was legit news. The fun lasted for the rest of Clinton's two terms, tapering off a little at the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #50
57. And 'Troopergate' was going on a while before that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
40. Quite right. And MSNBC was right in there.
Olbermann had a stint on MSNBC when it was a new network for a while (before he left and came back some years later.) You could tell he thought the Clinton-Lewinsky hysteria he had to cover and allow guests on for his corp masters night after night after night after night was **bullshit.** He's a different Olbermann, now, with a much stronger contract to handle his spot this time around, it appears. Thank god.

Limbaugh actually had a TV spot during part of Clinton's admin, too. It was non-stop hate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
44. So bad that Olbermann left MSNBC
I knew I wasn't imagining this:

When the Monica Lewinsky scandal broke in 1998, The Big Show with Keith Olbermann morphed into White House in Crisis. Olbermann became frustrated as his show was consumed by the Lewinsky story. In 1998, he stated that his work at MSNBC would "make me ashamed, make me depressed, make me cry."<28> Olbermann left MSNBC for Fox Sports Net shortly thereafter.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Olbermann#Countdown_with_Keith_Olbermann
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
38. uhh no. Not really.
It was REALLY bad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #38
58. Time tends to dim the memory, somewhat.
It WAS really bad. And it was really relentless from the day he took office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
29. I know. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
41. I just don't recall it being that bad
Maybe Faux was not up and running until well into the 90s?

He did have Limpbaugh going on for 3 hours per day each afternoon, though. I'll give it that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #41
52. You don't have a very good memory in that case. They came after Clinton with ROPE.
Edited on Sun Mar-21-10 02:27 PM by kenny blankenship
Not that I like Bill Clinton at all.

To hear the media tell it, Bill Clinton was a draft dodger, who traveled to Moscow and was a mole for the Soviet Union. Bill Clinton was selling nuclear secrets and ICBM guidance technology to Red China. Bill Clinton was not only guilty of sexual harassment but RAPE. Bill Clinton was a coke addict holed up in the whitehouse with a bowl of blow and a rocketlauncher. Bill Clinton presided over a vast network of real estate scams and drug trafficking ports of entry back in Arkansas. The list just goes on and on...

And these are things I learned not from FOX news, but from NPR and CNN and the Washington Post and NYTimes.

Oh yeah , and I forgot. As early as 1994 they were saying Bill Clinton MURDERED Vince Foster. That's how long the list of rope-worthy made up scandals & smears launched against Bill Clinton was: I could forget that the most respectable main stream media outlets acted as a relay for accusations that Bill Clinton murdered his White House counsel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. Three more words: Richard Mellon Scaife. You are correct about the Print Media too.
Edited on Sun Mar-21-10 02:35 PM by chill_wind
It wasn't just the broadcast media by any mere stretch.

Oh and don't forget he and his wife "murdered Vince Foster." :-/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
59. It was NOTHING like this
Clinton had hate radio 100% against him, but the CNN of the day, the only 24/7 cable station for most of his administration was, if anything, supportive. CNN was then owned by Turner.

As to the networks, they were on his side in 1992 - they certainly were fed up with Bush and their coverage of him was negative. As to Clinton, they showed the positive rallies and they sent the signal that his avoiding service in Vietnam was ok and that Gennefer Flowers was in the past.

The major newspapers were more liberal and far richer and more influential. The NYT magazine had a cover story filled with praise in 1990. This was the first in depth introduction many of us had to his story - before that all I would have known was the AWFUL 1998 convention speech. Now, given cuts, more and more of the news - even in major papers - is really the AP story. We all know the bias of the AP.

Now, did the media go after Clinton? The RW media was awful, but far fewer people gave it any credibility. That has changed. One moment that I remember seeing the change was in the Limbaugh "phony soldier" comments. This should have caused outrage - but in the end, it was said his decades of support for the media had to be considered before condemning him. That would not have happened in the 1990s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Clinton had to deal w/ it too
Same with the campaigns of Gore and Kerry.

BTW Fox is no more a news network then I am an NFL quarterback
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Faux wasn't even launched until 1996.
I don't even think there's a comparison. The mid-90's were SO different than 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. And Fox started from jump street w/ Whitewater and Monica / bj hunt


And from 1993 on there was all out effort on the right to ruin Bill Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. i did put news in parenthesis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Sorry .... I should have noticed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. lol....it's ok
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
43. Mr. Pedantic says
quotation marks, not parentheses. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. you forgot Bill Clinton
they created 2 or 3 new channels just to destroy him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. faux was just getting it's legs with the clinton scandal, they are in full destroy mode with Obama
faux just got started in 1996
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #13
36. true. Thank whatever for Rachel
we didn't even have that in 1996. Bill was a fool to believe the pubies and Obama should really know better by now. Wasn't it Norquist who said bipartisanship is another word for date rape?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
35. Unfortunately, Bill Clinton is the one who signed the telecommunications act of 1996.....
In essense, his signature on that bill created Fox.

So whatever Bill Clinton got, it didn't have to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a kennedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. yup, 24/7, destroy and defeat that's what they do best......
:mad: :puke: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. No president has ever had a 24/7 network cheer him on either
As did the folks at faux their bush master.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. I agree, but they also did a pretty good job on Clinton.
They aren't in this business to govern unless they are in the majority, and then it is not to govern, but to manipulate the government to their advantage...their pockets. They will mow down anyone in their way.

They are a greedy bunch. Greedy for wealth and greedy for power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. Not even close. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. The jobs they did on Clinton and Kerry were mere rehearsal
This is the command performance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
15. i was ashamed of the media after watching the Obama grilling from faux
i have never seen a sitting President treated like Obama was on the faux show last week.

not a shred of respect for the office OR the Person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elias49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
17. If Clinton had (really) been black
he'd never been a 2-term president imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sneezepaddle Donating Member (83 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
18. Faux News will go the way of The Gong Show and The Jerry Springer Show.
Americans may be slow, but they are not stupid. Once they figure out they've been duped Glenn Beck will be doing 3 a.m. infomercials for colon cleansing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. a good chunk of americans are stupid...the teashitters have proven this to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
42. Their ratings are going down -
Glenn's ratings are down, if I recall correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
20. Without a doubt! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left coaster Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
23. True that..
But let's not leave out the other corporate noise machines, CNN and MSNBC.. both Faux Lite..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. but when it comes to faux....nobody does it better
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left coaster Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Yeah, they were the first.. and still the ugliest!
I think, though, a more dangerous, insidious harm is being done via the corporate outlets like MSNBC and CNN, because so many people still think that they are unbiased news sources..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
25. It's become a screaming wall of raging hate hasn't it?
I think part of it is because they truly fear that all their 'gains' during the Bush Era will be taken away. That's why they go so overboard when they criticize any person who might compel some compassion for the sick and dying. We think it's hate, but much more likely it's fear of losing ground. A lot like the gut wrenching fear we endured during Bush's eight years. They're probably more terrified than fearful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Agree Lunatica
that Murdoch and his minions are using propaganda to stay powerful both economically and politically.

They want the U.S. to be a 3rd world country with a few people having all the money and power. That's why they want to "privatize" social security and why they support the privatization of student loans and Medicare (Medicare Advantage). That's why they have been against health care reform; even though this reform is relatively mild, it does put a foot in the door. The poorer you keep the people, the less power the people have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
athenasatanjesus Donating Member (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
30. The worst thing is the perception is that he is more loved by the media then any president ever
odd how that perception comes from the media as well =p
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
31. Your memory is awfully short...
.. or maybe you were born after the 90s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. faux didn't START till 1996....and i'll bet i was born before you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
33. I think if you looked at newspaper articles and radio over the last 100 plus
years, that may not be true. However, I do agree that Fox has a large hold currently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
34. Good thing it's only Faux Snooze.


Otherwise someone might notice.


:rofl:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clyde39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
37. Compare to how they ALL treated Bush and you'll be sick
Keith and Jon eventually realized that the time had come to call Bush/Cheney on their disgusting policies, etc. but all the others continued to kowtow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
45. Hillary Clinton would be treated no better. They would dress her up like Chairman Mao.
Oh wait, they did that on conservative magazine covers in the 90's, didn't they?

It's amazing how many here have forgotten the absolute visceral hate there was for the Clintons.
Along with the White Supremacist hate groups, the surge of the "Christian Identity" militia groups, abortion clinic bombers and murderers and the batshit insane apocolyptic Y2Kers who couldn't wait for TEOTHWAWKI so they could blame the Clintons for the downfall of the whole human planet.

Their objective is to destroy any_perceived_liberal in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. it's anyone opposed to their view of the world...and a member of the democratic party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. RRR hate speech and hate-mongering. It's a deadly toxic sewage
that began flowing plenty thick and foul easily going back to Ray-gun and the level has only continued to rise unchecked under the aegis of "free and protected speech." We're now at utterly lethal levels. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mariawr Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
48. I was there. Clinton had it really bad. The VRWC was also 24/7...
and took no prisoners.


However, with our President being Black, this adds a whole new dimension to their lies, hate and slander.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
49. Faux was founded specifically to destroy Bill Clinton
They soent eight years lionizing Bush and vilifying every Democrat around, then went into full-scale Obama Attack Mode the second he started to look like he might want to be president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
51. The Fux Propaganda Network - You will think what we tell you to think!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
53. What're you, 18?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. +40
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
55. Yep. It'll be worse than what Bill Clinton experienced.
At least he did not have FUX Noise after him 24/7 BEFORE he was even elected, nor do I recall disrobed KKK showing up to GOP rallies armed with assault rifles making thinly veiled threats to assassinate the President of the United States.

Obama has to deal with the recently remodeled and remanufactured 'New American Nazi Teabagger Klan' who are ready and attempting to start a civil war.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC