Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More Than 20 Major Amendments were Made to Improve Social Security between 1935 and Today

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:43 AM
Original message
More Than 20 Major Amendments were Made to Improve Social Security between 1935 and Today
Today's HCR Bill will also see improvements after it passes. If you are saying this de-electirfies the 3rd rail or won't ever be improved, you are simply wrong. Today is an Historic Beginning to Health Care Reform in the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. LOL
Rah rah! Go team!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Dean and Kucinich are on that team.
But feel free to sit on the sidelines for this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Sidelines?
Are you kidding? I'm being forced to pay prices for corporate skyboxes to sit in the weed patch across the parking lot, on the other side of the freeway, where I can't even hear the crowd roar, let alone the cheerleaders (that's you, by the way). But you keep assuring me that maybe, someday, I'll get to see the game in some sort of small way, but it'll still cost an arm and a leg. Go team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. When do you honestly think we'll get another chance to at least BEGIN this process?
It took us months of wrangling to get the bill we have now--how much longer would a more progressive bill have taken? How many more congresses and election cycles?

It's YOU that's holding out for a "someday" that may never happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I'm not holding out for anything in this corporate driven country.
I'm working a plan to retire somewhere more sane in 14 more years. Sucks, but I can't afford to live here much longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. And you objected to my use of the word "sidelines."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. No I didn't. I thought it was a spectacular analogy.
Where do you get that I objected to the use of that word?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Ah. Mea Culpa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. No problem
:hi:
I'm just heartbreakingly crushed by this Presidency, even though I knew this was exactly how it was gonna turn out. I tried this morning to feel good about today, but can't when I stop to consider what's in the plan that's going through today. More people buying "coverage" they can't afford to use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. If you're planning to leave...
bon voyage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Thanks.
I'll still come visit frequently, Wyoming is the absolutely most beautiful spot I've been in all my travels. I feel priveledged to have grown up here and to still live here, and will miss it dearly, but I'm tired of struggling so much. With the money I'll save, I can afford two roundtrips yearly and still come out ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubledamerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Hey, wish me & the other expats here bon voyage too -- YAY, we WON a mandate/excise tax
and used a steamroller but not to steamroll through a public option because that would've been distasteful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. I agree. Better to let the status quo evolve to the breaking point.
Then, single payer will emerge organically as a "bailout".

The deaths in the meantime are acceptable losses & collateral damage.

Rah rah, go team!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. Rrriiggghhhtt... I gotta bridge to sell ya. In the meantime, millions will die.
NOTHING will get done if we get to the breaking point except that millions of poor will be culled from the population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. Agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, this is just the beginning groundwork
It can and will be built up over time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. yep, although the purist here would rather see nothing
happen if they can't have exactly what they want right now . A sign of political immaturity in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. No, it is not--Democratic majorities will suffer huge defeats in
November and be gone in 2012. Guess who'll probably do the billing for the mandated insurance should you fail to pay? Guess how many companies will either reduce employment, cut insurance and/or raise prices when they are forced to provide insurance for all employees? With Medicare bankrupt in 2017, SS not breaking even for the next four years, we are going to put in a new Healthcare system and provide subsidies for those who can't pay it? Disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yes, after they passed that bill mandating everyone to invest with a for profit company on
Wall Street, they came back, fixed it, and gave us the system we have today.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yeah, that's why the left was ignored to 'include republican ideas'..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. and Social Security was NOT built with a FOR PROFIT cartel in the mix
FAIL.

EPIC FAIL.

on to the next spin....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. THIS. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. But it was IMPROVED several times after passage. That's your big argument for NOT passing this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. If the bill needs fixing, that guarantees that it will never be fixed
We did health care last year, so take your Medicare buy-in amendment and stuff it. That's what we'll get told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
11. Agreed, Berni. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. Social Security was a new program designed to fill a need where no other program existed at the time
Edited on Sun Mar-21-10 12:20 PM by dflprincess
It did not require that people invest in private companies in the hope that they might have some money available when they needed it after they retired.

As time went on Social Security was expanded to cover more groups - much like Medicare should have been now if the Democrats had had any real interest in Americans actually being able to access care instead of just being forced to buy "coverage" from their campaign contributors.

During the Reagan administration cuts were made to the groups previously covered. And whether or not you can get disablility payments from Social Security often depends on how good a lawyer you can afford because how the rules and regulations for that are enforced can depend on who is running things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. Exactly what program exists today to provide health care to those who've been denied it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Several states have programs that are not run by for profit crooks
nothing in the bill being debated will guarantee that those with preexisting conditions have have access to care - only that they will be required to purchase over priced "coverage".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. Socialization vs Privatization
A debate that means fuck all to you, I guess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
21. Most people who needed it for their very survival were DEAD before it even started to get fixed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. This framework has zero in common with Social Security.
But thank you for the valiant effort at spin. I will gladly pay you on Tuesday for a hamburger today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
25. And the big Social Security corporations that owned lots of politicians and used that ownership to
Edited on Sun Mar-21-10 12:34 PM by Karmadillo
engineer the original Social Security bill to their liking fought those amendments tooth and nail. Oh. Wait. There weren't any big Social Security corporations that owned lots of politicians back then. My bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
31. If Franklin Delano Roosevelt had a DLC congress
We would not only NOT have Social Security today, we would probably all be speaking German.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
32. sure the reagan-era "improvements" = taxation of benefits, older retirement age, increased % taxes
to generate a 2 trillion dollar surplus for wall street.

great stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
34. So, did Social Security start out as a mandate to invest in the stock market for retirement?
With the IRS docking your pay if you didn't comply?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC