Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

a toothless mandate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:33 PM
Original message
a toothless mandate?
Edited on Sun Mar-21-10 01:34 PM by northernlights
I just saw what the penalty for no insurance is. $95 in 2012 rising in 2014 to $695, never to exceed 2.5% of your income.

With totally subsidized coverage for those under 133% of poverty level and premiums not to exceed 8% of income or something to that effect.

I'm starting to feel less sick to my stomach. I really hope this is true. I cannot -- CANNOT -- afford insurance at this time. I never really want it, don't use it, expect to die if I ever get seriously ill and won't fight it any longer than to find my furfamily homes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. If you cannot afford it then you probably will get a subsidy

If you don't get a subsidy you probably could get a waiver.

But your right they have reduced and delayed the 'evil' mandate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sure, he can get a subsidy, like I will
The remainder, for me, will be $1200 a year. I need to get another job or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. If you get another job it'll raise your income and lower your subsidy
which will force you to come more out of pocket. (At which time you might need a third job who knows.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm painfully aware that my options go from fines to the workhouse
That's the only thing that I'm against in this bill - the mandates for payments from poor folk like me - not the poorest, they'll get a bonus, not the richest, they'll easily be able to afford it, but for people like me on the lowest level of economic sustainability, the mandates are a tipping point. My fines will go unpaid. Let them come and jail me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I am in a simliar situation

However if I had this bill 10 years ago I wouldn't have lost my house and everything I own to a relatively minor health problem

Not perfect but it does do a lot.

I may have to take a wavier but for many it will help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. There are loop holes
If you are of meager means, but can only get the more expensive coverage, there are loop holes that prevent you from having to pay the fine. Of course, you still won't have insurance, or any right to health care, but you won't have to pay the fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shrek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not only that
If you refuse to buy insurnace and are subsequently fined, there are no criminal or civil penalties for failure to pay the fine.

Page 336 of the bill (PDF link below).

http://democrats.senate.gov/reform/patient-protection-affordable-care-act-as-passed.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. The bill is garbage and is unconstitutional. I hope to hell there is a lawsuit to stop that piece
Edited on Sun Mar-21-10 01:49 PM by earth mom
of crap! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. It is the protesting kind who are going to use refusal as their next move.
I will enjoy seeing them fined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-10 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. 8% of my income for insurance that pays 70% of my bills. Sounds like a con.
Yeah, the real sticks won't come into play until 2014. You know, after election time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC