Executive Order Details Possibly Leaked - FDL

[WillyT]

Executive Order Details Possibly Leaked
By: David Dayen Sunday March 21, 2010 9:53 am

<snip>

K-Lo thinks she has an early copy of that executive order (which she writes as “The Executiive Order” – and she’s the editor-in-chief of National Review) on abortion funding. There’s no way to authenticate this, but it sounds like a reiteration of the Hyde Amendment, and in particular applies it to community health centers. This could potentially tie up some Planned Parenthood clinics, although that’s somewhat unclear.

NRO writes this off as non-binding and useless. Others say it codifies Hyde, but I don’t read it this way. It just restates what’s already in the bill, and applies Hyde to the community health centers. That doesn’t bring Hyde into law, necessarily, because if the amendment isn’t re-upped in an appropriations bill, there’s nothing to which to apply it.

For the purposes of this legislation, if this satisfies Stupak and his bloc the drama ends, because Pelosi and the team will have the votes to pass.

UPDATE: MSNBC reporting Stupak’s a yes. Again, that would be the ballgame, because he’d bring most if not all of his bloc with him.

The language on the flip:

Proposed Executive Order Language

1. The Executive Order directs that the Hyde language found in sections 507 and 508 of the Labor HHH Appropriations Bill shall apply to the HR 3590.

SEC. 507.

(a) None of the funds appropriated in this Act, and none of the funds in any trust fund to which funds are appropriated in this Act, shall be expended for any abortion.

(b) None of the funds appropriated in this Act, and none of the funds in any trust fund to which funds are appropriated in this Act, shall be expended for health benefits coverage that includes coverage of abortion.

(c) The term ‘‘health benefits coverage’’ means the package of services covered by a managed care provider or organization pursuant to a contract or other arrangement.

SEC. 508.

(a) The limitations established in the preceding section shall not apply to an abortion —

(1) if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest; or

(2) in the case where a woman suffers from a physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself, that would, as certified by a physician, place the woman in danger of death unless an abortion is performed.

(b) Nothing in the preceding section shall be construed as prohibiting the expenditure by a State, locality, entity, or private person of State, local, or private funds (other than a State’s or locality’s contribution to Medicaid matching funds.)

(c) Nothing in the preceding section shall be construed as restricting the ability of any managed care provider from offering abortion coverage or the ability of a State or locality to contract separately with such a provider for such coverage with State funds (other than a State’s or locality’s contribution of Medicaid matching funds.)

2. Under this Act, Hyde language shall apply to the authorization and appropriations of funds under section 10503 of the Community Health Centers.

SEC. 10503. COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS AND THE NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE CORPS FUND. Pages 2355-2357 of H.R. 3590.

3. Under this Act, the Hyde language shall apply to the section 1303 of the HR 3590.

SEC. 1303. SPECIAL RULES. Pages 2069-2079 of H.R. 3590.

4. Under this Act, the Accommodation of Conscious is recognized.

(a) NONDISCRIMINATION.—A Federal agency or program, and any State or local government that receives Federal financial assistance under this Act (or an amendment made by this Act), may not—

(1) subject any individual or institutional health care entity to discrimination; or

(2) require any health plan created or regulated under this Act (or an amendment made by this Act) to subject any individual or institutional health care entity to discrimination,

on the basis that the health care entity does not provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions.

(b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘healthcare entity’’ includes an individual physician or other health care professional, a hospital, a provider-sponsored organization, a health maintenance organization, a health insurance plan, or any other kind of health care facility, organization, or plan.

(c) ADMINISTRATION.—The Office for Civil Rights of the Department of Health and Human Services is designated to receive complaints of discrimination based on this section, and coordinate the investigation of such complaints.

5. Addition Conscious Provisions

“(1) Nothing in this Act shall require an otherwise qualified health plan, including an Exchange-participating plan, to cover any items or services to which the issuer, plan sponsor, or purchaser has a moral or religious objection, provided the plan is at least actuarially equivalent to a qualified health plan that covers the essential health benefits.

“(2) If a health plan is permitted not to cover items or services under paragraph (1), then the issuer, plan sponsor, or purchaser shall not be required to include such items or services in such plan as a condition of (A) being eligible for a premium tax credit or cost-sharing reduction, or (B) avoiding any assessable payment or any other tax, assessment or penalty under this Act.

“(3) Nothing in this Act shall prohibit a qualified health plan, including an Exchange-participating plan, from contracting with an individual or institutional health care provider that declines to provide, participate in, or refer for an item or service to which the provider has a moral or religious objection.

“(4) Nothing in this Subsection shall be construed to deny, alter, or modify any right or duty any person may have under state or local law, or under federal laws other than this Act.”

“(5) Nothing in this Subsection shall be construed to authorize a health plan to deny coverage for all medical care, or for life-preserving care, to an individual based on a view that treats extending the life or preserving the health of the individual as of lower value than extending the life or preserving the health of others because of the individual’s disability or other characteristic.”

<snip>

Link: http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/03/21/executive-order-details-possibly-leaked/

:shrug:

[babylonsister]

1. FDL now getting info from NRO?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Review

National Review (NR) is a biweekly magazine founded by the late author William F. Buckley, Jr. in 1955 and based in New York City. It describes itself as "America's most widely read and influential magazine and web site for Republican/conservative news, commentary, and opinion."<1> Although the print version of the magazine is available online to subscribers, the free content on the website is essentially a separate publication.

I dunno; I think I'll wait as to avoid giving them any legitimacy.

[naaman fletcher]

2. NR was once a very good magazine...

I disagreed with the vast majority of it, but it was well-written, informative, etc. Buckley was for drug legalization, amoung other things. Jonah Goldberg in particular has turned it into a neo-con rag.

That being said I still read NRO, as you always want to know what the enemy is up to.

[DURHAM D]

3. Proof that Stupid's manuvers are just about his next race.

talk talk talk

The Hyde Amendment needs to go but this seems like no big deal.

What an ass.

[LiberalFighter]

4. If this language is in the executive order than screw them all.

The language should at least allow abortion as currently permitted for federal employees and congressional members.

[Name removed]

5. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[berni_mccoy]

6. FDL + Leaked Info = Fail.

[Luminous Animal]

7. Final White House text of Stupak's extortion.

http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/03/white-house-statement-on-abortion-compromise.php

[WillyT]

8. Um... They Weren't Wrong About The Executive Order Last Night !!!

And they were the FIRST to report it!

:shrug:

[Luminous Animal]

9. Your credibility has officially sunk to zero.

[berni_mccoy]

11. FDL has zero credibility. They made this into something it isn't. What the EO says is that

the current law will be enforced. Stupak caved and you and FDL can't deal with this bill passing.

[Luminous Animal]

12. They didn't make this into anything. You must think that DUers are too stupid to read

The author of the linked article states this:

"NRO writes this off as non-binding and useless. Others say it codifies Hyde, but I don’t read it this way. It just restates what’s already in the bill, and applies Hyde to the community health centers. That doesn’t bring Hyde into law, necessarily, because if the amendment isn’t re-upped in an appropriations bill, there’s nothing to which to apply it.

For the purposes of this legislation, if this satisfies Stupak and his bloc the drama ends, because Pelosi and the team will have the votes to pass."

[Luminous Animal]

10. Kick.