Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
dtotire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 10:56 AM
Original message
Supreme Court
Some Republicans will challenge HCR in the Supreme Court. How will the SC decide? With this reactionary court it's hard to know. The argument is that this is not interstate commerce. Thomas probably will say that the law is definitely unconstitutional. I don't know about he rest. If Social Security was constitutional, then so is HCR. But what we don't about the views of the rest of the court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. I postulated on just this same concept yesterday.
Here's what I wrote...

"HCR passes. freeps freak out, we dems (whether for or against) celebrate, SCOTUS via roberts rules it unconstitutional. We freak out, the freeps celebrate."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7977269
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. It really depends on the arguments. It may be easier to attacks aspects of the bill...
and hope to whittle it down so only the rich get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Arguments against the unconstitutionality will be based on Article 1 section 8...
The same clause upon which they based the defense of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.
Article 1, Section 8 states:

"The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States."

Also, Medicare and Medicaid are settled law and Constitutional based upon the above clause. I don't think they will find five votes to redefine how that clause has been used for two centuries.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. I read that if the lawsuit heard by the supreme court is brought
by the states, then it will probably be ruled constitutional. But if the lawsuit is brought by an individual claiming harm, then it may be ruled unconstitutional or there is a chance of that ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. I don't think that the argument that it is not interstate commerce is the way to go.
The healthcare industry is, what, 1/6 of our economy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Medicare, Medicaid, and Schip touch health care i all states. All are constitutional.
Edited on Mon Mar-22-10 11:25 AM by Ozymanithrax
Constitutionality is based on

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States


It is the General Welfare clause. It covers Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Schip. If the current health care bill were found unconstitutional, then that could be used to argue that Medicare, Medicaid, and Schip are illegal for the same reason. If Medicaid and Medicare are Constitutional, so is the current Health Care bill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. I don't see how it is NOT interstate commerce - when all people are
required to purchase private insurance, and such companies are based all over the states.

Also, SS does NOT require us to purchase something from a private company - the REAL equivalent to SS would be SINGLE PAYER, and this is the opposite of single payer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC