apples and oranges
(772 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 02:23 PM
Original message |
There will always be people who slip through the cracks |
|
and can't be helped.
We have housing programs, but there will always be homeless people.
We have food stamps, but there will always be hungry people.
We have government health care, but there will always be people with no access to it.
It's impossible to help everybody get everything they need.
|
Raven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message |
piratefish08
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message |
2. It's not impossible to try. |
kestrel91316
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 02:29 PM
Response to Original message |
3. FAIL. "We" don't have government health care, other than people on Medicare. |
|
If we DID, no one would be without health care unless they didn't WANT it.
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 02:46 PM
Original message |
LWolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 02:29 PM
Response to Original message |
4. A national health program |
|
could ensure that the only people who "slip through cracks" in the health care system were those who chose to do so.
We will always have students who slip through cracks because public education can't control the environment students come from; because there is a finite number of minutes in the day, number of hands in the building to steady those slipping, and number of resources to reach out with; and because free will has a lot to do with succeeding at anything.
That doesn't mean we shouldn't be trying to fill those cracks as tightly as possible.
|
el_bryanto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 02:30 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Yes - but that doesn't mean you don't try |
|
More to the point you provide potential access to it - which right now people don't have.
Bryant
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Not really true. There will always be people who don't avail themselves of |
|
social services. Yes, we had homeless, back when there was no need to be homeless, but these were hobos and skid row habitues who didn't want to be in society but could drop back in any time they wanted to because the programs were there to house, feed and rehabilitate them. We were able to care for our dysfunctional souls among us because there were institutions to house them in. In the Reagan years they were thrown out in the street. It wasn't voluntary. We never had universal access to health care so people died without health care but were able to die in a bed where they lived. We have gone backwards, not forwards. Old people have access to health care through Medicare. If they choose not to have it, they can in the future if they need it. There just isn't anyone who falls through the cracks in Medicare unless it's their choice.
|
Donnachaidh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 02:35 PM
Response to Original message |
7. and that gives selfish people a pass on attempting to try to help, doesn't it? |
|
Wow -- welcome to the land of the free and the *Fuck it, I can't be bothered*.
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. You know the proverbial leading a horse to water, but you can't make it drink? |
|
But if you are a caring horse owner you provide the water for the horse so that when it's ready to drink, it will be available to it. What's so hard for people to understand about that?
|
Donnachaidh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
16. they look at the *potential cost* of the water |
|
I'm sickened by the utter lack of compassion I'm seeing in this country. :puke:
|
stranger81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 02:46 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Enjoy your (hopefully) short stay here. [n/t] |
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 02:46 PM
Response to Original message |
11. There are people who don't know what they qualify for |
|
The government might try to reach out, but surprisingly, there are people who never find out about things.
|
leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 02:47 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Another 'The poor will always be among us' thread |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 02:47 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Cleobulus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 02:51 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Yes, the Government by and large sucks at providing these services... |
|
Mostly thanks to Republican Interference, but that doesn't mean it always has to be this way. I swear this is a stupid fucking argument, and fucking cruel as well.
|
Greyhound
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Wow, another candidate for most intellectually bankrupt post of the day. |
|
There are no cracks there are huge chasms purposely built so the parasites can steal more.
There are no housing programs, there are welfare programs for property owners.
There are hungry people because we are so conditioned to greed that we deny food to children to preclude any possibility that a parasite might miss out on some profit.
There is no "government health care", there is care and there is profiting from the denial of care.
Not only is it possible, it is cheap. About 10% of our military budget (the official one, not the real one) can accomplish all this worldwide, see the accompanying U.N. reports.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:59 PM
Response to Original message |