Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio judge forces rape victims to take polygraph tests

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 05:45 PM
Original message
Ohio judge forces rape victims to take polygraph tests
CLEVELAND, Ohio -- A Juvenile Court judge has ordered at least four teenage girls who were victims of sexual assault to submit to polygraph tests, baffling prosecutors and upsetting the victims.

Cuyahoga Juvenile Court Judge Alison Floyd ordered victims in separate cases to be examined after she had found their attackers delinquent, the Juvenile Court equivalent of guilty.

Floyd also ordered the teenage boys who were accused of rape and other sex crimes in those cases to undergo polygraph examinations as part of an assessment done before the teens would be sentenced.

None of the teen victims has followed the judge's order.

Floyd did not respond to three days of attempts to contact her for comment.

It is unclear from her orders what Floyd's intention was in having victims take polygraph exams or what questions would be asked of them.

http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2010/03/juvenile_court_judge_alison_fl.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. I met her a while back and she is a piece of work all right...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nemo137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Can you expand on that a little? "Piece of work" how?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. WTF
Edited on Mon Mar-22-10 05:49 PM by etherealtruth
Ah, I forgot Rape isn't like other crimes ... it's usually the victim's fault :sarcasm:

edit, because I clearly can't spell the simplest of words
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's called the Fifth Ammendment and that shit breaks it. n/t
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Not if they are given immunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. You can be compelled to break the 5th Ammendment if you're given immunity?
My point here is "compelled". I find that hard to believe. I still don't think they can break the Fifth Ammendment even if they promise immunity- this is all based on the position that they do not wish to voluntarily testify.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. This is not about not voluntarily testifying.
This is before sentencing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalNative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. How disappointing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. So a judge who can't allow these tests in court is ordering them?
That's strange. If they aren't reliable in court then they aren't reliable anywhere. Or am I missing something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. They could be admissable in sentencing in a juvenile case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
24. That still doesn't make it a good idea
seeing as flipping a coin is about as accurate as a polygraph.
The only people that actually claim polygraphs work are the "experts" that make money administering them. About the only use they ever had was trying to crack a suspect that didn't know they were pseudo-science. Which is hardly the way to treat a rape victim, no matter what the reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. I never said it was a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. I want that judge to take a drug test.
Pee in the bottle and let's see what's what, Yeronner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. Ah,
that notoriously accurate test best corrupted via asshole manipulation...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Polygraph tests...
.. do NOT work and should not be any part of law enforcement or the justice system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
middle distance Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. they do have limited value
they are not reliable enough to use as evidence in court, but the government uses them to sometimes weed out false accusations or test suspects for deception. I believe they are generally considered more reliable for detecting deception than they are at successfully detecting truth telling. Thus there is a greater rate of false negatives than false positives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. This is so fucking wrong!!!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. I don't know the judge, the victims
or the alleged offenders, but could this have something to do with many teenagers crying "foul" as a way of getting back at a boyfriend or crush? It seems to me that if both parties are being subjected to a polygraph that this might be the reason. Again, I don't know any other reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
18. *facepalm*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
19. But....I thought polygraph tests don't hold up in a court of law!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. The judge intends to use them in the evaluation for sentencing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
name not needed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
21. People falsify police reports for other crimes too.
Should everyone that calls 911 have to take a polygraph?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
22. No other crime victims are treated this way, are they?
There are certainly false reports for a variety of crimes -- robbery, domestic abuse, etc. but since when do we make victims take lie detector tests?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
middle distance Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. other crimes don't have the same evidentiary issues
sex crimes are often the hardest to prove because they often lack evidence. robberies and domestic violence don't have that problem as much. and while false accusations happen in other crimes, sex crimes present more varied possible motivations for a false accusation; also, the very fact that they often have no evidence makes it easier to falsely accuse. for these reasons, authorities may find it useful to give a polygraph to the accuser, particularly if there is evidence to suggest a false accusation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Wrong! In rape cases you have lots of physical evidence!
Semen,tears, signs of forced entry...not to mention things like his skin under her fingernails, scratches on her attacker, etc.

Certainly far more evidence than one might find in, say, an attempted robbery case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Depends on what kind of rape it is.
Most rapes are "acquaintance rapes" (the broader term for date rape and other forms of rape that are not the stereotypical "grab a woman off the street" type of rape), which are essentially he-said-she-said in many cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. So what? Acquaintance rape still leaves scars and damage.

Tears, scratches, signs of forced entry would argue against it being consensual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. But then the rapid could argue that it was just "rough sex".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
25. Holy shit.
That is beyond disgusting, and so are the bulk of the posts in this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC