Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Overheard today at my small family local produce store

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 01:52 AM
Original message
Overheard today at my small family local produce store
There is a fairly new shop in our district in Los Angeles. It is run by an extended family that just happens to have a lot of sons. It sells wonderful, locally grown vegetables and fruit (some of which is organic), locally hatched veggie-fed eggs and even grass, range-fed beef and other great things. That's not remarkable in some places, but in our lower income neighborhood, it's just wonderful.

Today, I was picking out some vegetables when the owner announced, "Yesterday was a historic day." The two of us who happened to be in the vegetable aisle at the time stopped shopping and looked at him. I wondered what he was talking about. Had he served his 10,000th customer or something. Then he said, "The health care reform bill was passed which means I can get health care for my employees." He then explained that he is has been covered by a certain company, but that, recently, that company raised his rates so high that he was going to have to stop the coverage. Now that this reform bill passed, he believes he will be able to find something more reasonable.

I hope he is right and can actually find a better insurer. I am very disappointed that the bill does so little to lower insurance costs. It could at the very least have a public option or immediate rate increase limitations.

But my grocer reminded me that for a lot of people, this bill is the answer to a prayer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. What a powerful message!
Here is someone you know who will be directly and positively affected by this bill...

I am encouraged to hear this!

Thank you...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cicada Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. subsidies for small employers begin immediately - 2010
look at the section on small business tax credits - fits your example to a Tee

http://docs.house.gov/energycommerce/SMALLBUSINESSES.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks for the link
If the economy rebounds and we make larger profits, small businesses will be better positioned to purchase insurance. But, as I mentioned in my earlier post, we have to have the money available first to pay the premiums before we can get the (up to) 35% tax credit. It sounds like a great deal but it doesn't help the businesses that need it the most. A full economic recovery is what we need to provide higher wages and benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ummm
The exchanges won't be formed for another two years and the subsidies don't kick in until 2014. I believe the small business tax credit starts 6 months after the bill is enacted but if he can't afford it now, I don't think it will be much help since there are no price controls to keep the price of policies from rising once the insurance companies are forced to provide more mandatory services. A tax credit is really only effective if you actually have the money available to pay today.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Right now there is no limit on how much an insurer can charge to a small group
Edited on Tue Mar-23-10 03:09 AM by pnwmom
with a member who has a preexisting condition. One sick employee can make the premiums skyrocket for the whole group. There is also no limit to the profit/overhead that can be charged. The new bill will require that most of the premiums go toward actual medical expenses -- not profit or overhead.

The CBO figures predict that premiums will drop about 10%, but that's overall. The drop could be much higher for small groups that are being charged exorbitant rates due to one sick employee.

And if insurers continue to rack up excessive increases, they're just asking for the government to step in again with a public option or even Medicare for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. And now that insurers
Are mandated to offer specific coverage they probably didn't offer before (depending on the state) the prices will increase.

As far as I know, they can still charge more depending on the age and the health of the people in your group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. They can charge more based on age but not health. And the gap between the
lowest and highest premiums (assuming the same coverage) will be much narrower than it is now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. if they can charge more for age, seems an incentive for employers not to hire older people.
or to get rid of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. That's already the case. With the new law, the disparity between the cheapest
employees and the most expensive will be greatly narrowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. how so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. By law. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. no, in what sense does it narrow the gap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 03:31 AM
Original message
It's absolute age discrimination
Given the seal of approval by our Congress.

My healthy 55 year old husband can be made to pay 3x more than a 30 year old overweight type II diabetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 03:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. Congress has REDUCED the age discrimination. The difference is much greater now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Well, whoop-de-freaking-do

It's nice to know there is still one type of discrimination supported and legalized by the congress and our President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I think it's unrealistic to not recognize that older people are more subject to
health problems. Even a seemingly healthy 55 year old is much more likely to drop dead of a heart attack tomorrow than a healthy 25 year old. That's what the "discrimination" recognizes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Just as its unrealistic
To recognize people with pre existing conditions cost the system more?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. If he had even one employee with a preexisting condition, that could have meant
the rates would have been extremely high for his whole small group. The new law should help with this, since it limits the amount a insurer can charge no matter what the person's state of health.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. No
There are no limits to the insurer. There are no built in cost control measures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 03:31 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Not true. They will be limited in the differential they can charge policy holders.
The hope, obviously, is that competition -- under new rules -- will pressure insurers to keep their rate increases down. If they don't, they can expect more regulation, or a public option or single payer. This is their chance to put up or get out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. plus the grocer gets tax breaks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
17. He'd better keep praying
as this is going to cause rates to skyrocket over the next few years as the insurers seek to lock in the highest possible "base" rate before the law kicks in.

He as a business owner is better off not insuring anyone (not even himself) under this law, to simply pay the fine and pocket the change. Should anyone get seriously ill, sign up at that time but not before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
18. Does't this bill give a sort of discount to small business so they
can afford insurance for their employees. I saw it some place and I think it takes effect soon and not in 2014.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
19. How can this be
It's all bad. I read that on DU. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC