Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SINGLE PAYER - And the Fundamentals of Politics

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WeekendWarrior Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 07:59 AM
Original message
SINGLE PAYER - And the Fundamentals of Politics
For a political forum it amazes me how so many people can be completely clueless about politics in this country.

There are many here who are moaning that the Dems should have simply ignored the Repugs and voted for single payer healthcare. As much as most of us -- if not all -- would like to see this country have a single-payer system, the REALITY of the situation is that single-payer WOULD NEVER HAVE PASSED. The way the Democratic party is made up at this particular point in time, there would not have been nearly enough votes in Congress to pass such a bill.

What we have witnessed instead is political gamesmanship at its finest, designed to do two things: 1) pass SOME kind of meaningful healthcare reform upon which we can build; and 2) keep the Democrats in power in Congress.

I can only assume the mastermind behind this strategy was Obama, with an able assist from Nancy Pelosi and (gag) Harry Reid. The plan was to reach across the aisle in a gesture of bipartisanship in hopes of forging a bill both sides could support, but with the full knowledge that if you gave the Republicans enough rope, they would hang themselves just in time for the November elections.

Which, of course, is exactly what happened.

So as much as we would all have loved single-payer, it just couldn't happen in this political environment. But now we DO have something that can be improved upon, and we may well have the political capital to get more progressive representatives into Congress who can revisit single-payer in the future.

If you thought an entire health insurance infrastructure was going to change in one fell swoop, you were sadly naive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. You're absolutely correct.
You will hear presently, though, from many who don't care about practical politics. Idealism is a great thing, since it drives progress, but idealism rarely gets through our legislative process. Perhaps never.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. My thoughts exactly. If we never get anything accomplished
we will go out of power once again and stay out of power so that will assure a perpetual life in the desert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. We got what the powers that be wanted..
Health insurance has now become an individual obligation and there will be a massive transfer of taxpayer funds to the health insurance industry.

And Obama is part of the powers that be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. +1 for that dose (pun intended) of reality. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. But...but...you're spoiling Christmas! Hush, now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Exactly
spot on, that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeekendWarrior Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Cynicism doesn't win votes
or persuade the electorate or our representatives. You're unhappy with the bill, then work within the system to improve it.

I'm sorry, but I can't get behind the defeatist frame of mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. It wasn't a defeat, it was a win..
For the health insurance industry..

Acknowledging reality isn't defeatism.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeekendWarrior Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Here's a dose of reality:
Millions of people will be helped by this legislation. MILLIONS.

That's a win for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Why don't we wait and see how things actually turn out?
Let's see what the cost-benefit ratio is and whether it curtails the skyrocketing inflation in health care costs.

I don't see any way a bill mostly written by health insurance industry lobbyists is going to be all that great for the average individual.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. +2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. It should have been ON THE TABLE to tilt the table further left. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeekendWarrior Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. NOTHING would have tilted this farther left -- that's
just the point. The makeup of Congress -- despite a Democratic majority -- would not allow for it. There are too many centrists and blue dogs in office. Single payer was off the table because it meant one less thing for the right to attack.

I mean, think of the brilliance here. THEY OFFERED UP A REPUBLICAN BILL and got the Republicans to vote against it. That's SHEER genius.

And it's a bill that can and will be greatly improved upon as time goes on, but ONLY if we, as voters and activists, can change the makeup of the Democratic party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. Most of the shit Reagan pulled NEVER would of flew in Carter's America
He used his charisma and campaigning to re-align the political spectrum, such that he didn't have to craft policy that was restricted by the old political environment.

People like to pretend that the political spectrum is static. This is fallacious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
10. Question:
If we had single payer wouldn't there be a mandate that everyone has to buy in?

--------------now a rant--------

The reality is that comprehensive Health Insurance Reform, for the first time in our lives, is done. It is an accomplishment that arguments to the contrary are getting tiresome.

'Twould be nice were there were some real and politically possible solutions presented along side the bitching, but all we get is bitching.

We understand the frustration, hell who doesn't want the problems of the world to be solved and we live lives of bliss and tranquility?

But then, nothing ever changes without force, eh?
"If you push something hard enough, it will fall over."

So, cheers to those who are pushing for mo' better.
Just realize exactly what it is you are pushing against.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC