Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TR could not do it. Nor FDR, or HST, or RMN, or WJC, but...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:17 AM
Original message
TR could not do it. Nor FDR, or HST, or RMN, or WJC, but...
Barack Obama was able to get it passed. How was that possible?

Barack Obama persevered. He did not give up. He was patient. He worked long and hard and wore down the opposition. And at the right moment, he struck. The opposition was over-whelmed and his side was inspired to act.

How could any American not be proud? To see the first African-American President sign such an historic piece of legislation had to warm the cockles of the coldest heart. Every journey begins with a single step. This was a big step.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Happyhippychick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not even the powerhouse team of Bill and Hillary could do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. He also let Congress write it, allowing it to emerge organically from that branch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. True.
He let it run a natural course, without trying to force one issue over another. For instance, he did not demand a "public option".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. If he didn't try to force one issue over another ...
then he really didn't do much then. So shouldn't congressional Dems be getting this praise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demodonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. The first African-American Pres with the first female Speaker of the House...

...got it done.

We'll, OK it's not really DONE, but at least there is a start.

A law is on the books that at least recognizes that every American needs and has the right to healthcare even if as of now they still have to buy it from private insurance companies.

Now let's improve from here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. Jesus H. Christ !!!
While I enjoy a great gloat-fest as much as anyone, can we not inject just a bit of reality into this affair?

A very persuasive argument can be made that Obama succeeded where others failed because he simply let the health insurers write the goddamned legislation and he agreed to cut a deal in secret while he said someting different in public. Maybe if TDR or the Clintons had offered the health insurance industry or other vested interests the same types of deals we would have been slaves to the industry decades ago.

I find it mildly amusing that many DU'ers seem proud of wearing their willfull ignorance about what happened with HCR like a crown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
christus.victor Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. I'm aware...
I'm aware that the health insurance industry and their knights (conservatives) were appeased; but on the bright side, this is at the very least a step forward - a considerable step forward, considering the conservative derailing of America since 1980.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Don't assume that the insurance companies got a "permanent" deal...
For the first time in history, they are being regulated to some degree. If they go "off the reservation", so to speak, they could pay a steep price. This was the brilliance of the move. The insurance companies, thru their greed, jumped at the assumption they were going to reap all the benefits. That is not as yet a certainty. In fact, that will likely lead to the reform that we actually need. Higher prices and monopolistic practices will be the rope that hangs the insurance companies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Regulating the percentage of collected premiums to be paid out in claims seems major.
It brings insurance into a paradigm more like public utilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
christus.victor Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. The battle has just begun.
We've got to make sure the Democrats (especially liberal Democrats) maintain the majority in the House and the Senate. Any progress made by the current administration will be immediately torn apart by Republicans if they regain the upper-hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. We need cap and trade now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. I see Jesus was here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
12. FDR/Truman/TR wanted a socialized approach, not technocratic adjustments on a capitalistic system
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. But maybe....
that has to be the first step? That was their mistake, attempting to jump straight into a socialistic approach? In today's political climate, it would be even more difficult. This was the first step, in my humble opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. First steps are according the idealogical road maps that determine final destinations
Edited on Tue Mar-23-10 11:49 AM by Oregone
A capitalistic first step that legislates multi tiered private insurance, even in a government exchange, is not a step that will lead in the same direction as an egalitarian and socialized approach.


Its a neato talking point though. Just baseless. There is no sound idealogical foundation and vision for this reform, nor promise it will suddenly shift to an economic & polictical system in the interest of the people. On the contrary, today private industry is that much more integrated with the government, and thereby, influential to the overall direction this will go in.


Heh, maybe they should of started by privatizing Social Security from the get-go. Could you imagine how socialized, non-profit, and fair it would be today?!? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
14. By making sure "it"
was a steaming, peanut riddled, log for us, and a snickers bar for the corporations. That's how.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Maybe you would like to take a stick....?
and dig around in it just a little bit? There might be a pony in there! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
17. Faulty premise. Of those, only Clinton, Obama wanted mandatory corporate insurance. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Do you think that is forever?
Or can circumstances change?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I think it will change right after the NAFTA renegotiations and the bankster bonus tax bill
Edited on Tue Mar-23-10 11:53 AM by Romulox
Both of which the President signaled were top priorities for him. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
21. Actually, I think the often vilified Nancy Pelosi got the job done.
Obama didn't do a whole hell of a lot, really. He didn't write the bill. He never really put his name behind anything aside from high rhetoric. He only twisted arms in the final hours of this long, drawn out process.

And you know, that's my biggest gripe in all this. We had a leader who had political capital out the wazoo and didn't spend any on this.

Last era, we had a president with no political capital whatsoever spending it like a drunken sailor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
22. How was it possible? Dubya fucked up the country enough to give us a brief 60 seat majority
It didn't last, but it was there long enough to make the bill's deliberations asshole proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC