Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harkin: Craig Becker To Get Recess Appointment (bipartisan crap out of the way now!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 01:06 PM
Original message
Harkin: Craig Becker To Get Recess Appointment (bipartisan crap out of the way now!)

http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/03/24/harkin-craig-becker-to-get-recess-appointment/

By: David Dayen Wednesday March 24, 2010 9:01 am
TweetTweet2 Share

Earlier this month, Labor Secretary Hilda Solis intimated that Craig Becker, a nominee for the currently non-functioning National Labor Relations Board, would get a recess appointment to the body. Now Tom Harkin is saying the same thing, telling CQ “It’s going to happen” during the Easter recess, set to begin March 26, or whenever the reconciliation bill is completed in the Senate.

I think we can dismiss the idea that this is idle chit-chat by the fact that business groups are mobilizing against the recess appointment:

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce led 20 business lobbying groups in urging President Barack Obama not to use his executive power to appoint union lawyer Craig Becker to the National Labor Relations Board.

“We urge you to respect” the “overwhelming sentiment of our members throughout the business community,” groups including the American Trucking Association, the National Association of Manufacturers and the National Retail Federation said today in a letter to the president. Tens of thousands of members have written to oppose Becker, the letter said.

The NLRB currently has two members, short of a quorum. As such, hundreds of labor disputes, even the ones where the two members agree, cannot be adjudicated. The Supreme Court recently heard a case arguing that the 2-member board could eliminate some of its backlog by ruling on cases where it had unanimity, but many of the Justices appeared to resist overruling the quorum law. As a result, “Decisions in hundreds of worker-employer battles could be thrown out if the Supreme Court rules against the NLRB. Such a ruling could also force the NLRB’s shutdown when the Senate and the White House can’t agree on who should be on the board.”

The board has had two members for over two years.

A recess appointment would signal that the President has an antidote to Republican obstructionism that he does not fear using. Craig Becker is a qualified nominee who falls in with the normal set of Democratic appointments to the NLRB. He should get his appointment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's about time.
They've made it quite clear that the logjam will become even larger, so let's get these positions filled and start working for the American people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah....Yeah!!
K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Great....BUT!!!..STFU about it beforehand...please!!
Edited on Wed Mar-24-10 06:23 PM by SoCalDem
GW did not go around telling everyone what he "was-a-gonna-do".. he just DID it, and moved on..

Obama needs to "mass-appoint" all the people who have been stalled, and then just make one announcement about how we can no longer wait around for republican obstructionists, who WANT nothing positive to happen for us all..

and then say nothing more about it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Dawn Johnson, Dawn Johnson, Dawn Johnson, Dawn Johnson!!
Who else has been held up by the party of no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC