Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tweety Announces That He'll Apologize To Grayson For Being So Wrong On Reconciliation!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 11:20 PM
Original message
Tweety Announces That He'll Apologize To Grayson For Being So Wrong On Reconciliation!
Nah, not really.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0310/Rainey_Dont_expect_Matthews_mea_culpa.html

Matthews told me that, smoldering YouTube clip notwithstanding, it was Grayson who got it wrong back in January. He said the congressman was obviously referring back then to the House passing a new piece of legislation, rather than signing on to the approved Senate health bill and then having differences reconciled.

"He denied the House had to pass the Senate bill and then have reconciliation," Matthews said at one point. "I never got an answer from him, all I got was a posture. He wasn't helping me explain it. He was just taking a position."


Like what Rosen's described as the "Church of the Savvy," Rainey places Matthews in the "Brotherhood of the Astute -- those insiders supposedly so informed on the ways of Washington they deserve our special admiration -- willfully declined to acknowledge the remaining uncertainties."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's too bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Tweety still refuses to acknowledge that he's wrong?
He was so obviously, outrageously incorrect--and so fucking self-satisfied about his position--that the idea he can still defend himself seems absurd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It almost defies credulity, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. .

rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC