lamp_shade
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-25-10 12:42 PM
Original message |
| godai
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-25-10 12:43 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Amendments are finished in the Senate n/t |
| MUAD_DIB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-25-10 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 8. What was added? I hear something on the radio this AM, but |
|
didn't catch it. Does the bill now have to go back to the House for another cry fest by the repukes?
|
| Tommy_Carcetti
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-25-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. THAT'S FUCKING AWESOME!!!!! |
|
It must be a pretty big fucking deal if the Veep actually performs the duties of Senate President.
|
| Motown_Johnny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-25-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. This is a big F___ing deal |
| tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-25-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. The Chair would like to recognize, "This is a big fucking deal." |
| lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-25-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 5. Damn straight! A big fucking deal. |
| rocktivity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-25-10 12:57 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. You mean the bill won't have to go back to the house? |
| joanski0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-25-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 7. From what I read this morning, the bill will |
|
then go back to the House, and the House is planning on voting on it today.
|
| godai
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-25-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. Nelson (D NE) votes no! n/t |
| DefenseLawyer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-25-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 10. Were you expecting him to vote yes? |
| dccrossman
(530 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-25-10 01:10 PM
Response to Original message |
| 11. Should have to go back to the House |
|
Edited on Thu Mar-25-10 01:14 PM by dccrossman
There were a couple of technical changes in wording. Not substantive, but any change required a return to the House. FYI: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100325/ap_on_bi_ge/us_health_care_overhaul |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:02 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
