Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Looking back on all of it now, would you have liked to have seen a "trigger" public option?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 04:24 PM
Original message
Looking back on all of it now, would you have liked to have seen a "trigger" public option?
Yes, yes, I know we all wanted either a real public option or single payer.

But if that was not in the cards (for whatever reasons, we can debate that somewhere else), do you think this bill would have been better or worse with a "trigger" for a public option? Or is it better to just drop the pretense and not have a public option at all, if a real one can't be put in the bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought the "opt out" idea wasn't horrible. Where states could opt out of the PO after a few year
Edited on Thu Mar-25-10 04:30 PM by emulatorloo
Basically I couldn't imagine any states telling their citizens they are going to opt out after having the PO for several years.

Medicare expansion I liked too -- pissed me off that Lieberman killed that after supporting it before.

I am an optimist, I think there is going to be another push on the public option at some point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Absolutely--it would serve as a check and balance against the mandates
I'd settle for a lowering of the Medicare eligiblity age--and if the Rethug AGs win their court case, well, the Dems wouldn't have any choice in the matter, would they?

:evilgrin:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sen Bennet of Colorado could have made a PO happen today
The Reconciliation Bill had to go back to the House where the leadership said they had the votes. Bennet said he had the votes, too. Done deal.

That's what I wanted to happen. Unless of course Bennet was just play acting and so were some of his "supporters" in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, I posted during the trigger debate that it could of been huge leverage
I never saw an equal playing field public option doing much good.

What would of done good was a looming single-payer trigger. Essentially saying, 'clean up or you will be gone'.

Back then, by giving up the public option in a weak form for a strong potential one wouldn't of been such a loss. Eventually they gave it up for nothing anyway to get the votes. Maybe those votes would of been there if it was a potential good option, rather than a real watered-down one. Maybe it was never supposed to be around anyway, and was just a carrot for progressives.

No one listens to me though, so fuck it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC