Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AEI Ordered NOT To Speak To Media Because "They Agreed TOO Much With What Obama Was Trying To Do"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 06:18 PM
Original message
AEI Ordered NOT To Speak To Media Because "They Agreed TOO Much With What Obama Was Trying To Do"
Edited on Thu Mar-25-10 06:19 PM by kpete
Bruce Bartlett says AEI health care experts “had been ordered not to speak to the media because they agreed with too much of what Obama was trying to do.”

David Frum and the Closing of the Conservative Mind
Mar
25
Bruce Bartlett

As some readers of this blog may know, I was fired by a right wing think tank called the National Center for Policy Analysis in 2005 for writing a book critical of George W. Bush's policies, especially his support for Medicare Part D. In the years since, I have lost a great many friends and been shunned by conservative society in Washington, DC.

Now the same thing has happened to David Frum, who has been fired by the American Enterprise Institute. I don't know all the details, but I presume that his Waterloo post on Sunday condemning Republicans for failing to work with Democrats on healthcare reform was the final straw.

Since, he is no longer affiliated with AEI, I feel free to say publicly something he told me in private a few months ago. He asked if I had noticed any comments by AEI "scholars" on the subject of health care reform. I said no and he said that was because they had been ordered not to speak to the media because they agreed with too much of what Obama was trying to do.

It saddened me to hear this. I have always hoped that my experience was unique. But now I see that I was just the first to suffer from a closing of the conservative mind. Rigid conformity is being enforced, no dissent is allowed, and the conservative brain will slowly shrivel into dementia if it hasn't already.

more:
http://capitalgainsandgames.com/blog/bruce-bartlett/1601/groupthink-right-would-make-stalin-proud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. The conservative mind was welded shut a long time ago.
No one has seen it in 40 years. What masquerades as conservative thinking is really just a totalitarian mindset whose only principle is getting and maintaining power. When they get power, they abuse it to further their own ends. Nothing conservative about so-called conservatives today. Anti-socialist, yes. Conservative, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. welded shut, put into an adamantium box, and then buried under 30 feet
of concrete ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Congratulations folks
"they had been ordered not to speak to the media because they agreed with too much of what Obama was trying to do.

You just declared a victory for passing a conservative health insurance reform package. Now THAT'S a BFD. What ya gonna do next? Invade Iran?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Probably presuming you've read what I have
I don't always put all the underlying explanations in. I presume after a time that much of the info is "common knowledge". Say, for example, when Obama explained that his HIR was very similar to the Dole/Baker package of 15 years ago. Or when he said he rejected "progressive ideas" in writing it. Or any of the half dozen (moderately) conservative writers that have acknowledged that much of this is the stuff of conservative ideals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Yep

Can't go confusing the rank & file. Gotta talk shit about what the corporations are pretty much lovin'.

In truth, the rank & file of the Democratic party and the Republican Party are both hopelessly confused about the nature of this administration. It is neither 'socialists' nor the friend of working people. It is the friend of business, as is every presidential administration, it's part of the job description.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. The conservative brain will slowly shrivel into dementia
Done and dusted. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, why does he think the AEI was started in the first place? To develop conservative spin.
Edited on Thu Mar-25-10 07:02 PM by MissMarple
And now the right wingers believe their own spin.

Surprise! Surprise!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. I suspect he will find a more open-minded place to work...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. maybe at HuffPo...
where Dan Froomkin ended up? Or Slate.com where Spitzer is? More likely at Politico though...

:shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well if Bruce Bartlett said it, then it must be true!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Same thing was said of Billy Tauzin when he spoke of his deal...
with this administraton.

:shrug:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. The proof is in the pudding, so to speak. The bill is to the right of Newt Gingrich.
For some reason a Dem passing corporatist ultra RW policy is considered a 'win' by some. It's bizarre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. As soon as Big Corpo got what it wanted...
(Individual Mandates + NO Public Option) the MSM became surprisingly accommodating of HCR.
No more "Death Panels", no more "Big Government Takeover", no more depictions of "Teabaggers" as loyal, patriotic Americans.....

The MSM is still in Hard Sell mode for HCR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. This would have lost them Progressive DEMOCRATS
That's why we're just finding out about this now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC