DainBramaged
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-27-10 09:37 AM
Original message |
WTF is wrong with M$NBC covering Sarah Failing and McLame???? |
|
I turn on the TeeVee and they are touting her appearance today with Wimpy McLame. WTF is wrong with them???? Do they think for ONE SECOND that a single FAUX NOISE viewer is going to tune in? NO, but they insult me with their obvious attempts to kiss the ass of the Reich-wing.
Fucking stoopid morans.
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-27-10 09:40 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I hear you; this is stoopid. I guess they want to give them validity. |
|
Bet mcsame's competition doesn't get the same treatment.
|
HereSince1628
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-27-10 09:42 AM
Response to Original message |
2. What republican would you rather have Obama run against???????? |
|
Sarah is the new spelling for FAIL.
|
DainBramaged
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-27-10 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. I do not disagree, HOWEVER, any Democrats getting the same coverage? |
|
I rest my case, uh ass on this chair......
|
tom_paine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-27-10 09:43 AM
Response to Original message |
3. M$NBC is still part of Corporate-Controlled Media. Never forget that. |
|
Sure, they air a few token liberal hosts, for which I am grateful, but when it comes to covering th news, they mostly keep to the same FOX/CNN RW Talking Points and double-standard rules.
|
ChairmanAgnostic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-27-10 09:46 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Well, it is news, of a sort. |
|
Frankly, the more people see of her, the less likely they are to support her for any orfice.
|
DainBramaged
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-27-10 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. My now passed Mom used to say of George Steinbrenner (she was a huge Yankees fan) |
|
the less I see of him, the better I like him........
|
RKP5637
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-27-10 10:04 AM
Response to Original message |
7. They will do anything for money, like the rest of the media whores. They think |
|
they will attract an element of the RW and attract more advertising revenue.
This is USA, Inc. Little has to do with fairness of coverage in the monopolistic media we have today. Nothing surprises me anymore in USA, Inc. This is now the country of "We the Corporations" for "We the Corporations." You, as a citizen, are an inconvenience to the bottom line unless they can sell sell sell to you in Consumerism America. And that is sad.
|
mike_c
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-27-10 10:05 AM
Response to Original message |
8. it's an economic investment-- the media cashes in by creating controversy... |
|
...and Palin in particular is a media money making machine as long as a group of vocally ignorant people is willing to stand in line to worship at her feet.
|
otohara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-27-10 10:07 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:05 PM
Response to Original message |