Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You lying motherfuckers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 02:04 PM
Original message
You lying motherfuckers
I posted this story yesterday:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=8022772

Sub New Mexico to be commissioned Saturday
By Steve Szkotak - The Associated Press
Posted : Thursday Mar 25, 2010 15:01:08 EDT

NORFOLK, Va. — The Navy is getting ready to commission its newest nuclear submarine.

This Saturday the New Mexico will be the latest to join the Navy’s attack submarine fleet.

On Thursday, the Navy held an open house to show off the 377-foot-long, Virginia-class attack sub. The 7,800 ton vessel was built for $2.7 billion at Newport News’ Northrop Grumman shipyard.

The New Mexico and its crew of 134 sailors and enlisted officers ultimately will be home-ported in Groton, Conn.

Article at: http://www.navytimes.com/news/2010/03/ap_new_mexico_com...


And the Navy Times posted this story today:

Commissioning for sub New Mexico
By Steve Szkotak - The Associated Press
Posted : Saturday Mar 27, 2010 12:56:09 EDT

NORFOLK, Va. — The Navy has commissioned its newest nuclear-powered submarine.

The 377-foot-long New Mexico was formally accepted Saturday at Naval Station Norfolk.

The $2.3 billion Virginia-class attack submarine was built at the nearby Northrop Grumman Shipyard in partnership with General Dynamics Electric Boat. It was delivered to the Navy four months early.

The 7,800-ton ship can dive to depths greater than 800 feet, operate at speeds topping 25 knots and remain submerged for three months.

The New Mexico ultimately will be homeported in Groton, Conn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. only off by .4 billion
close enough right?
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnArmyVeteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. How many MRI machines could have been bought with $400,000,000.00???
Or how many doctors, nurses and medications. Why are those on the right so obsessed with instruments of death? Do they think bazookas, submarines or air craft carriers will be able to save their lives if they came down with a deadly virus or a cancer? I wonder if getting seriously ill would open their eyes, hearts and minds to reality? I wonder if then they would realize they were wrong about blindly supporting military expenditures and condemning government health care reforms?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SolidGold Donating Member (121 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. if its the government buying it then 1. private industry, about 3000 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. More to the point is why we need a new $2.something billion submarine anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Just because
Isn't that a good enough reason?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. We get two a year like clockwork.
Have you heard the price is going up from $2.8 billion to $6 billion dollars a pop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. that's so F 35s can land on their dive planes
and the new presidential helicopter can land on the con.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Because were in an arms race with guys halfway around the world with boxcutters and AKs.
Edited on Sat Mar-27-10 02:19 PM by YOY
and Republicans might shit themselves if we didn't have them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. because you can cut all problems that might
help Americans and the money must go to the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Shhh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. because
the Somali pirates use these little boats with outboard motors that have to be shot out of the water by moneycannons manufactured by General Electric.

Jeez, get with the program will ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Shit.
There goes the 2.7 bil I was planning to retire on.

Or maybe 2.3 bil, which would have made things a little tight for me, but I'm willing to make some sacrifices, what with the depression recession and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. that military/corporate welfare sub would pay for a lot of teachers getting laid off nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I think that was the whole point of this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piratefish08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. building them is only part of the cost. i worked at a sub base where we overhauled and refueled
those beasts. NOT cheap.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. Do they come in red?? Please tell me they come in red... whales beware
we have attack subs with ear splitting sonar on board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Sonar that NO ONE sets to transmit, you mean...
Running active sonar is like inviting the other side to sink you for no reason.

Could be worse, though...Paul the Pirate uses jet skis to harass Japanese whalers. If there's anything stupider than trying to save an acoustically sensitive species by driving jet skis (which have a very large acoustic signature AND burn gas with oil in it), I'm not aware of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shedevil69taz Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. it is expensive
But we became the most powerfull nation in the world, in part by having better equipment than our enemies. I'm a little biased though being in the Army I like knowing the equipment that the American people provide for us will make sure we are able to win out in any future conflicts against whatever enemies might come along.

That's the catch though if you wait until the point of needing the best to defend this country RIGHT NOW it may be too late to get it built.

The Virginia class boats will be fewer in number to the number of Los Angeles class subs we have that they are replacing as well, which need much more maintinence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Our military budget is more than the rest of the world combined.
THE REST OF THE WORLD COMBINED.

Empires fall. Nations endure. If you love your country, wish it to be no empire.

Read Eisenhower's goodbye speech about the military industrial complex. He warned us but we didn't listen. The war profiteers are running the show.

Oh yeah, I was an Airborne Ranger. I'm no pacifist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shedevil69taz Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I wouldn't doubt it
if that were indeed the case, but I also would be curious to find the information you used to come to that conclusion, also whether or not it is entirely accurate.

I mean I would really doubt if China, Iran, North Korea, and even Russia are forthcomming with accurate information to the rest of the world as to how much they spend on their military.

You are right though, I do think sometimes we get involved in the affairs of other nations too often.

Hopefully too with this President we won't have much if any lasting presense in Iraq or Afganyland (its like disneyland only without the fun lol).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Oh, for fucks sake.
Edited on Sun Mar-28-10 07:42 PM by tabasco
Learn to get information and stop listening to a.m. radio for all your "knowledge."

In the time it took you to make your shitass post, you could have discovered the truth. It's not like it's some top secret information.

Stop being told what to think and think for yourself.

US defense budget = $664 billion in 2010.

This is the 2008 graph.



http://www.globalissues.org/article/75/world-military-spending

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. I like the fact that we have an intimidating military.
Nobody's going to f with us on any large or sustainable scale. 9*11 not withstanding, but there is real question about what really happened that day. And I like that security. I'm not cheering spending billions and trillions of dollars needlessly, or cheering the idea of violence as a solution, but if any nation is going to have the most powerful military in the world, I want it to be mine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. Russia spends 50 billion a year and we spend 700 billion a year ...and our people die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC