Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The teabaggers are not American revolutionaries

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 03:37 PM
Original message
The teabaggers are not American revolutionaries
The lunatic, spelling-challenge, violent teabaggers have nothing in common with American revolutionaries:

The profiteers say that the original American revolutionaries cast their tea into the Boston harbor as a simple rejection of taxation, so the modern tea party movement should similarly reject increased financial regulations, health reform, and taxes on the rich. But the history tells a different story. Boston revolutionaries rejected subservience to the East India Company, a British-run international corporation. They cast the tea into the harbor as a symbolic message to say that their taxes should go back into the American community, not subsidizing the profits of London elites and foreign corporations. Now, Republican tea party profiteers are trying to exploit the movement, pushing them to oppose policies which would actually liberate the middle class and crack down on international corporations. Despite the populist rhetoric, the profiteers see the tea party movement as a pool to extract fundraising dollars and volunteers for Republican campaigns. Indeed, RNC Chairman Michael Steele, himself a former lobbyist, has said that he has an “expectation” that tea partiers loyally toe the Republican line.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. No comment?
Edited on Sat Mar-27-10 03:49 PM by ProSense
Please, from anyone who believes people have a Constitutional right to overthrow an elected government?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Here is what they are...
..they are people who are scared. They were raised with the expectation of a better future and they see that the future looks grim. They have been betrayed by their heroes -- Bush, and Reagan.

They pay more for energy than they ever thought possible. They see their pensions being deflated, schools bombing, and the environment declining.

Their houses are worth a fraction of what they expected. Their children are rebelling. All their hopes and dreams dashed upon the rocks of what is left of their republican party. And there is a non-pure-white man sitting at the head of the table... another thing they never thought possible, and they hate him.

All in all, they have been lied to their whole lives and now they see the TRUTH writ large. They screwed up. And like all the other idiots of the world they can't take responsibility for their screwups --- they blame someone else.

Screw them. To hell with them. They are an obstacle to a better future with their current mindset. They must be STFU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. They are
people who ignore the facts that get in the way of their lunacy.

Insurrection Act of 1807

§ 331. Federal aid for State governments

Whenever there is an insurrections in any State against its government, the President may, upon the request of its legislature or of its governor if the legislature cannot be convened, call into Federal service such of the militia of the other States, in the number requested by that State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to suppress the insurrection.

§ 332. Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority

Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State or Territory by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion

§ 333. Interference with State and Federal law

The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—

(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or
(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.
In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution

§ 334. Proclamation to disperse

Whenever the President considers it necessary to use the militia or the armed forces under this chapter, he shall, by proclamation, immediately order the insurgents to disperse and retire peaceably to their abodes within a limited time.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. actually ProSense
I agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. they are ignorant redneck republicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think of them as corporate deregulating stooges
If it was three hundred years ago, they'd be for the East India Company
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. "If it was three hundred years ago, they'd be for the East India Company" Actually
they'd be for the "East Indi Copany."

:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. And stop calling them that. Call them Terrorist Party members
Let US control the meme for once!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. In McCains campaign Sarah Palin said it was a protest against government
She was reading her speech so I suspect McCain's people wrote it. That makes him look like the idiot. But then, he doesn't need Palin for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. They are the reinvention of the KKK, essentially, under a new name
and a new "kinder and gentler" 21st Century look for Plausible Deniability.

(they can't cover up or positively market violence on uppity Negroes and Liberals anymore without taking too much negative heat, so they took off the suits and joined the Rushpublic Party)

But then, all the Bushification of our nation over the last decade and really the last 40 years is in many ways a kinder, gentler, more plausibly deniable Klan/Nazi methodology.

And it's working. The Tea Party is a PsyOp designed to tilt the playing field even FURTHER to the right.

Thanks to a continuously complicit Corporate M$M, it is a complete success. (which is to say a complete failure for the future of our nation and humanity)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC