Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Chamber: Becker appointment 'contradicts' president's pledge to change Washington

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 05:27 PM
Original message
U.S. Chamber: Becker appointment 'contradicts' president's pledge to change Washington
Au contraire, I think it changes things quite nicely, thank you for your concern.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/89481-us-chamber-becker-appointment-contradicts-presidents-pledge-to-change-washington

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce slammed the president's plan to appoint Craig Becker to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) while Senate lawmakers are home for recess next week.

That decision, announced Saturday as part of 15 recess appointments President Barack Obama plans to make next week, "disregards the Senate's bipartisan rejection" of Becker and "contradicts the president's claim to change the tone in Washington," said Randel K. Johnson, the chamber's senior vice president of Labor, Immigration and Employee Benefits.

A handful of business groups have long feared Becker's likely appointment to the NLRB, in part because he is a vocal support of the Employee Free Choice Act -- legislation, better known as "card check," that would make it easier for employees to unionize.

The Chamber is among that bill's chief opponents. In a statement on Saturday, Johnson urged businesses to remain on "red alert for radical changes" -- including card check -- that "could significantly impair the ability of America's job creators to compete."

(end snip)

There they go again, 'red alert, code red' blah, blah, blah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. If the Chamber opposes something, I support it. Period. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Plus 1,000 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tmyers09 Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Pretty much the exact same for me as well!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Good rule... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Agreed.
It's been a long time since they represented the interests of any but the largest and richest corporations.

The more they hate it, the better it is for U.S..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. I'm definitely down with that.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodoobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. He needs those appointments to fulfill that change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. He got appointed? COOL.
And may I add, HALLELUJAH. Been a trifle worried about Obama's labor relations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. so if they do everything the chamber wants that is considered "change"??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Isn't the U.S. Chamber of Commerce a handful of wingnuts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Corporatists with a whole lot of money who continually bet on the wrong horse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Dear Chamber of Commerce,
Suck it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tmyers09 Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I was gonna finish the sentence with "fuck you", but this will suffice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. Pout pout pout ....can't they every act like Americans
guess not trash always shows doesn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. After spending $20 Million per month since Nov 2009 to defeat HCR they think they're

opinion means SFA??????

This is the same organization that tried
to defeat SASKATCHEWAN SINGLE PAYER HC
in 1958.

FUCK U USCC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC