Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Staying Execution: Supremes Get Something Right - FDL

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 10:46 AM
Original message
Staying Execution: Supremes Get Something Right - FDL
Staying Execution: Supremes Get Something Right
By: Ruth Calvo Sunday March 28, 2010 7:00 am

<snip>

The Supreme Court put off the execution of a Texas convicted person whose DNA evidence was never tested in the case against him. For once, it looks like the highest court in the land ruled in favor of an individual. Hank Skinner has been allowed to live for a while, at least until all doubts are settled. That is a basic standard of justice.

In the Skinner case, evidence that was obtained at the crime scene was neglected even though the person Texas courts condemned to execution protested he was not there, and was innocent. Another person has been implicated in the crime.

Skinner was set to die Wednesday for the 1993 murders of his live-in girlfriend, Twila Busby, and her two mentally disabled adult sons — a massacre he says he did not commit. For more than a decade, Skinner has been asking Texas courts to test a slew of DNA evidence that was not analyzed during his 1995 trial. His entreaties have been repeatedly rejected. In the days before his death, Gov. Rick Perry’s office was inundated with thousands of letters from around the world requesting such testing. Some state lawmakers asked Perry to postpone the execution to allow for analysis of the evidence. But he didn’t have to act on Wednesday. About an hour before Texas officials were scheduled to push a poison cocktail through Skinner’s veins, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a stay.

Skinner got the news as he was eating his last meal at the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Walls Unit in Hunstville. Officials there said he was tucking in to a cheeseburger that was among the smorgasbord of items he ordered to eat before his execution: a salad with ranch dressing and bacon bits, Popeye’s chicken, fried catfish, onion rings and a chocolate milkshake. “I had made up my mind I was going to die,” Skinner said. “I feel like I really won today.”

The court issued an indefinite stay, but it did not agree to accept Skinner’s case. The court said it needed more time to review Skinner’s claims and to decide whether to intervene. “This action suggests that the court believes there are important issues that require closer examination,” said Rob Owen, Skinner’s attorney and co-director of the University of Texas School of Law’s Capital Punishment Clinic. “We remain hopeful that the court will agree to hear Mr. Skinner’s case and ultimately allow him the chance to prove his innocence through DNA testing.”

While prosecutors tested some DNA evidence — blood samples from Skinner’s clothing that placed him at the scene of the crime — a pile of DNA evidence went unexamined, including a rape kit, murder weapons and other biological samples found the night of the murders.


For a person to be condemned to die, there should be no stone unturned to prove his guilt. In this case, that standard was not met.

I would love to have more reason to thank the Supremes for actions like this, that actually uphold this country’s claim to be under the Rule of Law. This time, they acted well and made the country proud.

<snip>

Link: http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/37717

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. who would run du if skinner were executed?
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorChode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Gov Goodhair damn sure wasn't going to act on this
He'd rather see an innocent man die than sacrifice his "conservative" principles. He's already proven this soundly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is not an innocent man
and I'll be happy when the DNA evidence shows it. If you go to resources other than death-penalty opponents to look up the cases they champion, you find that this evil individual got fucked up on drugs, and murdered his girlfriend and her disabled children. One of his actual defense arguments is that the blood splatter pattern on a wall could not have been created by someone trying to fight off a woman and two disabled people against one pretty coked-up man.

Bullshit. And when they do execute him, I hope they remember he's already had his 'last meal', and they give him bread and water, if anything. I wonder what Twyla Busby had to eat at her last meal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. And If It Shows It WASN'T Him ???
You gonna cook him an, "I'm sorry, I was wrong" meal???

Sounds to me like you're ready to "pull the trigger" no matter the results.

Why is that?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. If it shows it wasn't him
then of course, he will be released.

DNA is a double-edged sword, it has the capacity to prove without doubt that a murderer did a crime, too. That should make it easier to get the speedy executions we need to re-establish the death penalty as a deterrent. When you can kill someone wantonly, and face a two percent chance of being executed for it a quarter of a century later, the DP has lost any deterrent value it used to have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I can think of a number of countries with criminal justice systems more to your liking. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC