Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So now they're trying to "help" the uninsured

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
freeplessinseattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 02:15 PM
Original message
So now they're trying to "help" the uninsured
Edited on Sun Mar-28-10 02:17 PM by freeplessinseattle
Watching Rob McKenna (WA state AG) on a PBS interview right now, kvetching about the unconstitutionality of the HCR bill. His lawsuit against the bill is supposedly watching out for the interests of those who don't want to buy insurance, which is all well and good, but it seems like more of a teabagger alignment, correct? And how many of these teabaggers have no insurance and will be forced to buy the gubmint stuff? Probably very few. Just wonder who he is really representing.

Plus, why are they suddenly so much on the side of the uninsured-before they could eff off and die, now suddenly their rights are being trod upon, so unfair. Now the knights are coming out. spare me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KILL THE WISE ONE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. himself - he wants to be Governor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, he's a teabagger
I agree this insurance reform bill is a very far cry from what it should be. Nevertheless, the argument that he's "watching out for the interests of those who don't want to buy insurance" is pure teabaggery. Nobody wants to buy insurance. But if nobody buys it (until they get sick, of course,) it can't work. That's the way insurance works -- pooled risk, pooled premiums.

This is all about obama and his, um, being "different." Pure teabaggery. I hope the largely democratic legislature has the courage to put his department to sleep. No AG is better than a loose-cannon teabagger AG.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoSuz219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's a bogus claim... they won't win...
...something to do with Interstate Commerce.

Worst case scenario... if they did win... meaning if somehow it made it's way to the Supreme Court & got a 5-4 vote...

There's something in the Law that says if one part of the law is found unconstitutional (in this case, the mandate), it won't affect the rest of the Law. HCR is here to stay... and will keep getting better!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freeplessinseattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. oh, won't the teabaggists love them then!
because without the mandatory purchasing wouldn't the revenue have to be found elsewhere to make up for the loss, such as, Dear God, higher taxes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoSuz219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'm just waiting 'til the Bush tax cuts expire...
...so I can watch their heads explode... LOL

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
freeplessinseattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Love it or leave it!;) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC