Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawyer sues dry cleaners for $67M after trousers lost

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:16 AM
Original message
Lawyer sues dry cleaners for $67M after trousers lost
http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=nation_world&id=5264932

Lawyer sues dry cleaners for $67M after trousers lost
ABCNews JIM AVILA & MARY HARRIS

(5/02/07) - A Washington, D.C., dry cleaners says it's their business a longtime customer is taking to the cleaners.


A $10 dry cleaning bill for a pair of trousers has ballooned into a $67 million civil lawsuit.

Plaintiff Roy Pearson, a judge in Washington, D.C., says in court papers that he's been through the ringer over a lost pair of prized pants he wanted to wear on his first day on the bench.

He says in court papers that he has endured "mental suffering, inconvenience and discomfort."

He says he was unable to wear that favorite suit on his first day of work.

He's suing for 10 years of weekend car rentals so he can transport his dry cleaning to another store.

:shrug:

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. And this shithead was made a JUDGE? That's scary. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Must be one of those GOP judges always wanting to rein in all those frivolous law suits.
Edited on Wed May-02-07 10:52 AM by sinkingfeeling
I saw this story aired a on national ABC about 3:50AM CDT this morning. I then couldn't go back to sleep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I have little doubt! nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. Unfortunately, proabably not
Edited on Wed May-02-07 11:45 AM by JHB
Biography
Roy L. Pearson, Jr.
Administrative Law Judge

Roy L. Pearson, Jr. began serving as an Administrative Law Judge for the District of Columbia Office of Administrative Hearings on May 2, 2005. Before his appointment he served for two years as a contract hearing examiner for the DC Office of Police Complaints.

Judge Pearson was an attorney with the Neighborhood Legal Services Program (“NLSP”) from July 1978 through July 2002; the last 13 years as the Assistant Director for Legal Operations. In the latter capacity Judge Pearson was responsible for training and supervising a legal and support staff of 20-60 persons in neighborhood offices throughout the District of Columbia. NLSP provides civil legal assistance to indigent residents of the District of Columbia. During his tenure with NLSP Judge Pearson obtained jury verdicts in excess of $1 million dollars in both the DC Superior Court and the US District Court for the District of Columbia. His landmark Superior Court verdict of $15.9 million for nine clients was settled, after partial reversal and remand, on confidential terms.

Judge Pearson has been active in the Washington, DC community for decades and has served as counsel or board member for such organizations as the Columbia Heights Youth Club, the Fort Lincoln Civic Association, Inc., Black Seeds, Inc., the Washington Council of Lawyers, and the DC chapter of the National Council of Black Lawyers.

Judge Pearson earned his undergraduate degree from Lake Forest College. He earned his JD from Northwestern University School of Law. After graduation, he was first a graduate teaching fellow, and then assistant director, of a clinical program at the Georgetown University School of Law. The clinical program provided legal research, policy analysis and drafting assistance to committees of the Council of the District of Columbia, to the Mayor, and to various District of Columbia agencies. Judge Pearson has been a member of the District of Columbia Bar since 1978, and of the US Supreme Court Bar since 1985.
http://oah.dc.gov/oah/cwp/view,A,3,Q,604474.asp


But he's certainly "theirs" in the "what an arrogant, petty, vindictive asshole" department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
36. I looked him up and he contributed to Georg Allen's campaign in VA
Nice huh, for an African American lawyer...

(if it's the same Roy Pearson)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. This will either be laughed out of court
or he will be awarded the fair market value of used trousers.

Talk about a warped sense of entitlement. Pearson has just got to be GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadmessengers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. And people wonder why the American public has such a low opinion of lawyers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
40. he's a fucking JUDGE.
i hope HE'S made to pay something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
49. No -- no one wonders -- they know it is because of corporate media propaganda.
And the rubes who believe one sensationalist assertion does a whole profession make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. Somebody's pants are on fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. this judge should be impeached and then disbarred
what a waste of civil court resources...

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. my favorite part...
The ABC News Law & Justice Unit has calculated that for $67 million Pearson could buy 84,115 new pairs of pants at the $800 value he placed on the missing trousers in court documents. If you stacked those pants up, they would be taller than eight Mount Everests. If you laid them side by side, they would stretch for 48 miles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Yup
this is astounding, and a judge should know better. Well, anyone should know better, but particularly a judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. And some people actually wonder why lawyers are hated....
Simply amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
50. No -- no one wonders -- they know it is because of corporate media propaganda.
And the rubes who believe that one sensationalist assertion does a whole profession make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. How about we take up a collection, send him $100 for some new pants...
and tell this idiot to shut up already.

"Wah wah wah! You lost my favorite pair of pants."

Talk about arrested emotional development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. They found his pants
He says they aren't his.

A technicality in the law is allowing this, he's a major asshat for putting the entire judicial system at risk for his own games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
12. Those must be some AWESOME FRICKING PANTS!


FReepers would consider these to be "awesome pants".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moez Donating Member (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
34. You think anybody wants
a roundhouse kick to the face while I'm wearing these bad boys?

Forget about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. Ed? Ed Gruberman? Is that you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moez Donating Member (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #39
47. Boot to the Head!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. Nah nah naa!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
15. And, the inevitable comparison to the McDonald's coffee suit in 3, 2, 1...
MSM will love this, it's distracting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
16. Shades of My Cousin Vinney and the 1850's suit scene.
Edited on Wed May-02-07 11:08 AM by SimpleTrend
All joking aside, I hope the lawyer gets a new pair of pants out of this trouble. If the dry cleaner lost his pants, he should definitely get a replacement pair paid for by them, same brand, size, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #16
25. Read the whole story. They offered him thousands...
...not to mention they found his pants about three weeks later (but he claims they're not his).

This guy has no business being a judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
17. Is this the guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. I hope so, if not - he may sue you for false representation!
Gawd, I hope the publicity from this VERY frivolous lawsuit will totally humiliate this so called judge - pants or not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. I think he should go to the trial without pants. :)
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. Seems to be.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #22
53. If this the guy
then he appears to be African American and the Chungs are Korean. I wonder if there are some racial motives underlying this as these two communities have had a lot animosity under the surface, especially when Koreans own businesses in primarily African American neighborhoods.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
18. I'd like to see these pants.
Considering how big his cajones are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
19. Let's show some respect here
I hear this guy just became Bush's first choice for the
Supreme Court, should an opening occur before he leaves
office (please, ANYthing but that!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Wing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
21. someone needs to be dropped into the middle of the Pacific
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
24. $67 mill? What, did he leave his testicles in his pants and they shrank? (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. I don't think there has been a court YET that has awarded that much
for even a pair of testicles.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
26. Aaahh... nothing like the sweet smell of Abuse of Power!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prole_for_peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
27. that must be a great pair of pants....
being worth $67M for "mental suffering, inconvenience and discomfort"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. If $67 million is a legit price for mental suffering and discomfort for pants
Then Bush and Cheney owe me the GNP of China
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
28. Give me a break
Tough shit!... the dry cleaner's owe him his pants, that is all.

Mental suffering...how pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
30. fuck this asshole!!!
I hope he meets with some karmic justice, tout de fucking suite.

"It's affecting us first of all financially, because of all the lawyers' fees," Jin Chung said. "For two years, we've been paying lawyer fees. & We've gotten bad credit as well, and secondly, it's been difficult mentally and physically because of the level of stress."

<snip>

He brought one pair in for alterations and they went missing -- gray trousers with what Pearson described in court papers as blue and red stripes on them.

First, Pearson demanded $1,150 for a new suit. Lawyers were hired, legal wrangling ensued and eventually the Chungs offered Pearson $3,000 in compensation.

No dice.

Then they offered him $4,600.

No dice.

Finally, they offered $12,000 for the missing gray trousers with the red and blue stripes.

Pearson said no.

With neither satisfaction nor his prized gray pants, Pearson upped the ante considerably.

The judge went to the lawbooks. Citing the District of Columbia's consumer protection laws, he claims he is entitled to $1,500 per violation.

Per day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Seems clear he's just doing this to harrass them at this point.
No way in hell does this shithead belong on the bench.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
31. True justice in this case would consist of:
1) Pearson's case being thrown out as frivolous, or summary judgement in favor of the Chung's (they FOUND the frickin' "lost" pants quickly)

2) Chungs file their own lawsuit against Pearson for abuse of the legal system/malicious prosecution; they win; they are awarded court costs, attorney's fees, and substantial actual and punitive damages

3) Chungs file a complaint with the bar; Pearson gets fired from his bench and disbarred

4) Chungs buy Pearson's house when he is forced to sell it to pay all HIS legal bills; they live happily ever after; he winds up homeless

IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
35. Let me guess: Republican, right? Because frivolous lawsuits are so wrong.
and so are Republicans--

Yep--I just searched Newsmeat and apparently one Roy Pearson of Virginia contribute to none other than Macaca George Allen, Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ironflange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
37. Pssst. . . somebody tell him. . .
You DUMBASS, judges wear ROBES, so nobody can see your friggin' Men's Warehouse suit anyway!!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
41. He's an administrative law judge. Here's his official page:
http://oah.dc.gov/oah/cwp/view,A,3,Q,604474.asp

Roy L. Pearson, Jr. began serving as an Administrative Law Judge for the District of Columbia Office of Administrative Hearings on May 2, 2005. Before his appointment he served for two years as a contract hearing examiner for the DC Office of Police Complaints.

Judge Pearson was an attorney with the Neighborhood Legal Services Program (“NLSP”) from July 1978 through July 2002; the last 13 years as the Assistant Director for Legal Operations. In the latter capacity Judge Pearson was responsible for training and supervising a legal and support staff of 20-60 persons in neighborhood offices throughout the District of Columbia.

NLSP provides civil legal assistance to indigent residents of the District of Columbia. During his tenure with NLSP Judge Pearson obtained jury verdicts in excess of $1 million dollars in both the DC Superior Court and the US District Court for the District of Columbia. His landmark Superior Court verdict of $15.9 million for nine clients was settled, after partial reversal and remand, on confidential terms.

Judge Pearson has been active in the Washington, DC community for decades and has served as counsel or board member for such organizations as the Columbia Heights Youth Club, the Fort Lincoln Civic Association, Inc., Black Seeds, Inc., the Washington Council of Lawyers, and the DC chapter of the National Council of Black Lawyers.



Judge Pearson earned his undergraduate degree from Lake Forest College. He earned his JD from Northwestern University School of Law. After graduation, he was first a graduate teaching fellow, and then assistant director, of a clinical program at the Georgetown University School of Law. The clinical program provided legal research, policy analysis and drafting assistance to committees of the Council of the District of Columbia, to the Mayor, and to various District of Columbia agencies. Judge Pearson has been a member of the District of Columbia Bar since 1978, and of the US Supreme Court Bar since 1985.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
42. Let me tell you a little story.
I've just had a first-hand introduction to the civil litigation system in the US. You see, three years ago a useless jackass took it upon himself to back up his dump truck over half a mile on a construction site (with no spotter, and the back-up alarm malfunctioning) and in the process ran over and killed my father and another man. I don't want to get into the specifics, but we sued this retard, his employer, and the general contractor on the worksite for effectively creating an extremely dangerous environment which resulted in two people being killed. The figure we settled for was in the (very) low seven figures, and all parties agreed that this was fair, providing my mother with money to live once she retired.

I see a vast, vast gulf between the loss of my father, and the loss this man suffered due to a fucking pair of trousers being lost by the cleaners. It is exactly this kind of shit that gives the right ammunition for "tort reform" which is bullshit-speak for eliminating the rights of normal people to sue those who've harmed them. It is exactly this kind of crap that gives the system a bad name.

It was a pair of pants. Get over it. Move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. I am so very
sorry for your loss :hug: And yes, this idiot should be committed, and the key thrown away. There HAS to be yet another lawyer/judge joke in here somewhere!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
43. Personally, I think he should be committed to a mental institution.
Edited on Wed May-02-07 06:22 PM by LoZoccolo
He is clearly a threat to others based on the financial hardship he has caused the Chungs due to what is probably a severe personality disorder, if not some kind of delusional psychosis. I'm actually serious about this. And he should consequently also be declared mentally unfit to serve as a judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
45. Is he an undocumented child of Clarence Thomas???
And why does he need pants anyway?...won't the robe cover up his...er, briefs?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
46. What an ass
I hope he ends up paying all the Chung's legal bills plus their own pain and suffering at this point.

And he shouldn't be on the bench either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
51. i worked in d.c. i use to think the hardest customer was in restaraunt
i figured it was cause they were hungry or the food didnt come out as they anticipated leading to such ugliness and anger, but i was wrong. i have done customer service most my life in different industries and by far, the most obnoxious, arrogant, demanding, nonflexible customer is at the d.c.

i worked hard to satisfy my customers. one day a reg came in and looking for his order (4 hours earlier than i said it would be ready) me hunting it down to put it together, he says "dont bother, it is only clothes"

it was so reasoned, and so unusual for a customer to be reasonable, it about floored me and had mouth gaping open. lol. i laughed and said, ya... thanks, lol. and got his order for him. but it was the moment that has stuck with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyedyeto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
52. This happened 10 years ago??
He's suing for 10 years of weekend car rentals so he can transport his dry cleaning to another store.

Had to rent a car to take his cleaning somewhere else?

Talk about a frivolous lawsuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scrinmaster Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #52
54. No, he's suing for 10 years worth of car rentals
so he can take his pants to another dry cleaners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC