Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RNC hits 'bondage club' story

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:14 PM
Original message
RNC hits 'bondage club' story


The Republican National Committee is pushing back hard Monday on a story in The Daily Caller, telling POLITICO that Chairman Michael Steele was “never” at a bondage-themed nightclub in West Hollywood, Calif., as the publication suggests.

Buried in a Daily Caller story claiming that Steele suggested buying a private jet with RNC funds is the statement that “Steele travels in style,” citing, among other things, $1,946.25 “spent at Voyeur West Hollywood, a bondage-themed nightclub featuring topless women dancers imitating lesbian sex.”

POLITICO confirmed the RNC expense by examining the committee’s February Federal Election Commission filing. POLITICO also confirmed that the information provided on $1,946 in RNC funds spent Feb. 4 matches the nightclub’s Santa Monica address. The report, however, does not say who actually made the expenditure at the club.

The nightclub’s website was down Monday morning, and a phone call to the club’s promoter was not returned.

An RNC spokesperson told POLITICO that the committee is “investigating the expenditure in question" and went on to question the reporting behind the story.

“The story willfully and erroneously suggests that the expenditure in question was one belonging to the chairman,” the spokesperson said. “This was a reimbursement made to a noncommittee staffer. The chairman was never at the location in question; he had no knowledge of the expenditure; nor does he find the use of committee funds at such a location at all acceptable.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/35148.html#ixzz0jagMX6ow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is gonna be fun.
Watching repugs spinning this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. LOL. Their defence is that they reimburse staffers to go to bondage clubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. wtf is a "noncommittee staffer"?
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 12:17 PM by onenote
What is he (assuming it was a he) a staffer of and why is the RNC reimbursing this "noncommittee staffer"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. yeah, that caught my eye.
let's find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Guessing this means RNC staff rather than the actual Committee Members (3 per State)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Oh, it's just noncommittee staffers
and simulated Lesbian sex. No biggie.

:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. LOL ... That struck me, too ...
Why do I have the feeling that this ends up being a "liberal" ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Not sure this is any better than attributing the expense to Steele.
If this is some "non-committee staffer" - that person has got some serious chutzpah to put in for reimbursement. And the RNC still has to explain why they paid it. The real story is that the RNC can't keep their own fiscal house in order...just like they couldn't do it when they had control of the WH and Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Perhaps "hits" isn't the best choice of words...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yeah. "flogs" would be better . . . nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. No, someone who wanted to promote the story would be "flogging it"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. You're right--my bad! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Who cares about the story?
Tell me more about the flogging...:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I understand the Steele threads have links to the bondage club's
website (and don't forget the Searchlight threads with Caribou Barbie in pleather). Have a great time!:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Good fun for now, but I hope our filings are clean
Lots of WTF's have been known to get into FEC filings (See, "Edwards, John").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Here's our link...
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 12:40 PM by brooklynite
http://query.nictusa.com/pdf/169/10990396169/10990396169.pdf#navpanes=0

The most risque name I can find is a $77 dinner at the "Can Can Brasserie". I suspect, if there was something equally juicy, the Republicans would be screaming about it by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Thanks...The only scandal in there is the money wasted on Coakley
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. The buck stops on Steele's desk, whether he was there or not
He's responsible for all RNC reimbursements. End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. Perhaps he was there with Mistress Sarah?
wouldn't that be grand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. So isn't he the one who signs off on these? But has no knowledge of it?
and doesn't find it acceptable?

Next thing you know, they'll claim the Pope was the first one to report all the child molesters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. Imitating lesbian sex. well if nothing else that seals it.
republicans don't want no lesbian sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. I think we found out where Palin's leather jacket came from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
21. Yeah right. Bad, 'questionable' reporting. The reporter should be spanked.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
24. This photo won't be good for Steele:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC