Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ignoring popular opinion - does Rethug obstructionism parallel Vietnam?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:24 AM
Original message
Ignoring popular opinion - does Rethug obstructionism parallel Vietnam?
Poll after national poll puts American's support for benchmarks and dates for troop withdrawal in the 62-67% range. I understood many rethugs marching in lock step to Shrub's insanity for the first couple of years in Iraq, but now as we begin year 5 of this quagmire - WTF are so many of them still doing supporting a policy opposed by 2/3 of the American people? Is this not political suicide?

I'm not a historian, but is there anybody out there in the know that can draw a parallel to Vietnam? What was the Vietnam's war unpopular ratings polling at and for how long before we started air lifting troops out? I seek an example from our last big unpopular war to put into context the way of obstructionism from the BushCo regime.

How long can they remain in power NOT representing the will of We The People? Maybe history from the Vietnam era can offer a clue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not sure what the approval numbers were, but I think the turning
Edited on Wed May-02-07 10:38 AM by wienerdoggie
point where Americans started to strongly disapprove was 1968, the year of the Tet Offensive. Nixon supposedly ran on a platform of having a "secret way" to end the war, so obviously the war was a big part of the election, just as now. It still took 6 more years to end it, though, when Nixon and Kissinger knew it was pointless and "secretly" allowed North Vietnam to start winning against SV, and then the Dems cut off funds and got blamed. That's my read on history, anyway--y'all are free to dispute that version.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks for the history...
It has been said that the Bush administration exceeds the Nixon admin in secrecy. Up till now, Nixon set the bar for an isolated government.

Somehow the people reached the politicians during the Vietnam war and drove the powers that be to end it??? I seek to learn from the anti-war movement of the 60's because they WERE the change that ended the war. Appreciate your spin on it wienerdoggie :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC