Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Waxman asks AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson to address concerns over health bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 04:26 PM
Original message
Waxman asks AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson to address concerns over health bill
Congressman asks AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson to address concerns over health bill

Passage of the health care bill continues to generate controversy in both the public and private sectors.

On Monday, it was announced U.S. Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., sent a letter to AT&T and several other corporations asking them to verify that the bill’s passage will in fact cost additional expenses, including AT&T’s projected $1 billion charge.

(snip)
On Friday, an AT&T company spokeswoman would not comment on the changes beyond what was stated in the company's securities filing. AT&T wasn’t immediately available Monday to address the letter sent by top-ranking Democrats to the corporation.

In a letter addressed to Randall Stephenson, CEO, chairman and president of AT&T, Rep. Waxman and U.S. Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., who serves as chairman of the subcommittee on oversight and investigations, requested that Stephenson attend a subcommittee hearing on April 21 to publicly address how the passage of the bill will impact


Waxman and Stupak's letters to AT&T and other corporations
http://energycommerce.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1944:energy-a-commerce-subcommittee-to-hold-hearing-on-impact-of-health-care-reform-law-on-large-employers&catid=122:media-advisories&Itemid=55

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. I happen to know...because I was there a few years ago AT&T took their
employees (Cingular) vacation days...eliminated PTO for a total of 8 hours regardless of seniority.

I also happen to know that their benefits is currently sporting a $4,000 deductible yes, you have to reach that before copays go into effect.

So I don't buy their shit.

One
Fucking
Bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotThisTime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I don't buy their shit either, however our deductible is not 4K by a long shot
and in ten years DH hasn't lost any vacation days
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Were you Cingular? Because that is where it happened. I was on assignment there.
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 05:49 PM by xultar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. I hope this get lots more press
I am interested in this as I also think At&T is full of sheet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. AT&T, like many large companies, acts as its own health insurance company
They engage a health insurance company to administer the plan, sign up employees and retirees, and process claims.

But all the claims are paid out of AT&T's funds, not the insurer's funds.

So if HCR reduces health insurance company profits, it is reasonable that it will also reduce profits of self-insured companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. AT&T: What? They're calling our bluff?
oh crap.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotThisTime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. They can't explain with a straight face how they want to claim 100% when they get a 28% credit too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. good on Waxman. He's onto their lies once again
hopefully, the slimy bastards won't be able to escape with their skins this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. stupid embarrassing double post thing again
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 09:36 PM by UpInArms
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC