Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conservative Women’s Group "SPANKS" RNC Over Bondage-Themed Nightclub

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 04:34 PM
Original message
Conservative Women’s Group "SPANKS" RNC Over Bondage-Themed Nightclub
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 04:48 PM by babylonsister
I don't know what she's referring to with the DNC and pornographic exhibits funded by the stim bill. :shrug:


http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/democratic-national-committee/conservative-womens-group-rips-rnc-over-bondage-themed-nightclub/

Conservative Women’s Group Rips RNC Over Bondage-Themed Nightclub


The news that nearly $2000 in RNC funds were spent on a bondage-themed nightclub seems on the verge of creating yet another major headache for RNC chair Michael Steele.

The latest: A conservative women’s advocacy organization — one whose members donate to the RNC — is demanding answers. Penny Nance, the CEO of Concerned Women for America, which boasts half a million members nationwide, emails:

“Did they really agree to reimburse nearly $2,000 for a bondage-themed night club? We have several questions. For the RNC: Why would a staffer believe that this is acceptable, and has this kind of thing been approved in the past? And for the Democratic National Committee: Do you believe that it is appropriate to use tax dollars for pornographic exhibits like the ones recently funded by the stimulus bill?

“Please explain to Republican and Democratic women if and why you think it is appropriate to promote pornographic enterprises? As women we find the very idea of officials from either party approving of endeavors that objectify and demean women outrageous. This kind of behavior is not appropriate for national leaders that our children should be able to look up to as role models, and that our daughters could be working for.

“Did you really swill drinks, ogle young girls and plan party business at this kind of establishment? Please explain!”


Yikes! That last line should really make GOP donors happy. The central question right now seems to be: How did this expenditure of RNC funds get approved?

Like other past stories involving the RNC, this one is already leading to media mockery and ridicule — arguably the most difficult type of criticism to overcome. Indeed, Steele resembles one of those cartoon characters who gets hit on his head, develops a lump, only to get hit again, developing a lump on top of that lump, and so on…
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, does the buck stop with michael steele
or does he pass it on to some "non staffer"?

I'm actually surprised they might be held accountable for this! No matter hoe much the corporatemediawhores cover up for the gops..something always seems to ooze through, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. What are they yammering on about the Dems funding porno? Is there
any thing real to this or just one more red herring thrown in so they can scold but make it look like both sides are equally bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Clearly the latter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That's what I figured
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. It should be "Conservative Women’s Group *SPANKS* RNC Over Bondage-Themed Nightclub." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. You're absolutely right; edited.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Foot tapping, diaper wearing
spank daddies.

Hey, anyone got any more rope for em?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I don't see how they explain this one away. Should be
entertaining. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I would like it explained in LOTS of detail.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ooh, how kinky!
Was the RNC titillated by the spanking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Concerned Women for America
FFS...sounds like something out of The Simpson's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. They're not too concerned about everything else except themselves.
Fuck 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC