Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could Clinton have achieved healthcare iniative in 99.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:25 PM
Original message
Could Clinton have achieved healthcare iniative in 99.
I was working for a cruise line at the time. Basically for his entire second term so I was out of touch. But.... if these are actually repub ideas and we had the money which we did could it have happened and I mean either if the early nineties had not happened or even if they did?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Impeachment hearings
stopped everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Does that mean it might have been back on the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Almost any Democratic dominated congress could of passed this old rejected Republican idea for...
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 10:31 PM by Oregone
the last few decades...


Dont let the Kabuki theater fool you. Yeah, yeah, they all put up a good show, but if you turn back the clock you find out whose idea this really was and which party actually stood in the way of mandated & subsidized private insurance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Is that what Gore would have done?
I returned to the states just as the election of 2000 went crazy. And since I wasn't working got to watch it al live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Not sure. Its certainly seemed like the consensus reform for last few years so its possible
Just like NAFTA was a consensus structuring of international trade in the favor of the rich. It was up to each separate party to sell it to their base, whoever was in charge at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. They gave it a whirl during his presidency.
Things didn't work out.

The hammock rotted and the dog died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Hammock or Hemlock?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Hi, Skink. I don't remember. They took me to a place in a basement
somewhere just before the Lewinsky thing broke and didn't let me out until this year's Superbowl at halftime.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Prepare yourself....
The Red Sox won the world series at least once during that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Bullshit! I don't believe it for a minute!
Next you'll tell me that David Vitter hires hookers to change his diapers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. No.
Especially in 1999 with a pending election involving his Vice President. That would have created a battle similar to what we saw this go around, except the Democrats were in the minority at both the House & Senate levels. No way would they have had enough votes to pass anything.

Plus, Clinton held less clout after the impeachment proceedings, even though he was a popular president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Not necessarily. Even this time around, many Republicans rejected positions
that had openly taken not long ago. If the Dems were for it, then they were against it -- no matter what they'd said in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. The Republican Congress gave him SCHIP as a consolation prize in 1997
That was all he was going to get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. No. Not enough Dems. Too many were conservative. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC