Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A simple question on oil drilling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 10:12 AM
Original message
A simple question on oil drilling
Has it ever occurred to anyone that we might want to keep our oil in the ground just in case we need it in an emergency? One of the major contributors to Germany losing WWII was their inability to secure oil sources. They went for those early in the war but lost them as the war turned against them. I believe Japan also had similar problems.

Not that it matters. The idiots have won this battle, and we will drill everywhere, see no significant change in domestic output or prices, and ruin some pretty beaches and ecosystems in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes. And no one still will talk about conservation. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. It also never apparently occurred to a lot of people that a tiny bit of conservation
would eliminate the need to drill here, and it would help lower prices, while drilling will not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. most uneducated americans would never conserve


never.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. We wouldn't have an economy if most people conserved
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. But we would have more leisure time
Why bother with an economy when you can sit on the beach and read a book (borrowed from the library)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. That won't bring in much tax revenue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polly7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's not my intention to start an argument here.
but why invade countries and encourage the decimation of others' environments - ie, Iraq, Canada's tarsands ....... if your own oil should be saved? I believe that as a non-renewable resource, it's up to each country to figure out other ways to develop energy if they're not willing to use their own oil and gas. Doesn't that seem fair to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. It has occurred to me.
Also we have voluntarily abandoned our manufacturing edge.

I have long been a student of WWII history. Both our cheap and easy supply of energy and our manufacturing capability gave us an insurmountable edge in WWII. It was not the individual bravery of our soldiers that won the war, as sad as this might be for some to accept. Although we have many instances of incredible heroism and bravery under fire during WWII. Our nation's ability to grow huge amounts of food resources was also a contributing factor as was the rail system to carry it.

You are so right to point this out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Define "emergency"
TIA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Oh, say, a nuclear war between Iran and Israel
Or, say, the Saudi government deciding to sign an exclusive arrangement with China to sell their oil...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. I think we are already covered for that kind of thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. Changelicious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. I think that's the purpose of the Strategic Oil Reserve, isn't it? nt
Edited on Wed Mar-31-10 10:28 AM by Gidney N Cloyd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. That will last for a few months, tops.
What about years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tailormyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. That would be silly ! The Oil companies need the massive profits more !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polly7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. The Oil companies wouldn't receive the massive profits if
the populace didn't demand their product to the degree they do. We're not exempt from this here, either. Many European countries have figured out ways to live with less, why is it taking us so long? We're so self-entitled and have always treated it as a renewable resource, it's US that has to change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
11. "Has it ever occurred to anyone that we might want to keep our oil in the ground"
Period. Maybe change "our" to "the", if you want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
16. Have you thought it's just a way of taking another far right talking point away?
As a practical matter, new drilling is not going to come to a resort area anywhere near you anytime soon, offshore drilling equipment is booked solid for the next 5 years and slated for fields far offshore.

If there is another huge war, oil will be the least of our problems. We no longer have the ability to make very basic things like cloth and shoes. We no longer have the industry it will take to survive any large war, let alone win one. Hell, all it has to be is a trade war, at this point.

This country is like a soap bubble, nothing in the middle to support it but air. Our infrastructure has been allowed to rot and our industry has been shipped offshore or sold for scrap in the name of enriching the rich.

We're still bristling with nuclear bombs, but that's all we really have left and the main reason it's not likely to be a hot war, just one that will break us when we walk through our foreign shoes and our foreign clothing turns to rags.

This is the real problem, not keeping oil in the ground offshore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Of course. But facts never matter with them anyway
They will still believe that the evil "Libruls" are keeping them from their cheap oil. Just like they believe that Dems are responsible for the lack of refineries in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. or how Cheney and the technodulists blamed the 00-02 CA blackouts on anti-nuclear protesters nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tailormyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Ohhh, it's that 12 dimension chess again!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC