Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal Judge rejects Obama Administration "state secrets" claim against civil liberties lawsuit.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 04:30 PM
Original message
Federal Judge rejects Obama Administration "state secrets" claim against civil liberties lawsuit.



Wiretap of Islamic Group Ruled Illegal
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
March 31, 2010

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- A federal judge ruled Wednesday that government investigators illegally wiretapped the phone conversations of an Islamic charity and two American lawyers without a search warrant.

Jon Eisenberg, lead lawyer for the plaintiffs, said the complicated 45-page ruling holds the Bush administration program was unconstitutional.

The ruling came after U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said the lawsuit threatened to expose ongoing intelligence work and must be thrown out.

In making the argument, the Obama administration agreed with the Bush administration's position on the case but insisted it came to the decision differently.

Holder's effort to stop the lawsuit marks the first time the administration has tried to invoke the state secrets privilege. Under the strategy, the government can have a lawsuit dismissed if hearing the case would jeopardize national security.

The government argued that its ''state secret privilege'' trumped the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, known as FISA, which requires investigators to seek wiretap approval from a special court that convenes behind closed doors.

Read the full article at:

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/03/31/us/AP-US-Warrantless-Wiretaps.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. w00t!! great news!
score one for the US Republic. :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good bye fisa on appeal to supremes..(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. There is hope yet for the Republic...
maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. No that is bad. Without FISA there will be no or much less oversight.
FISA may need to be sped up or modified to meet the requirements that are presented my mixed traffic in carrier networks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, Better Believe It.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BunkerHill24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. I am beginning to dislike Mr. Holder.....
He looks timid, displaced, double-faced, playing games with the constitution in order to protect his job from criticism from hate merchants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. He's acting on orders from his boss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Good for the court.
That's one bait and switch the court won't allow the Obama administration to conduct with its voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC