Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RNC Tries to Deflect Attn from Lesbian Bondage Sex Story

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 05:32 PM
Original message
RNC Tries to Deflect Attn from Lesbian Bondage Sex Story
Edited on Wed Mar-31-10 05:45 PM by Stephanie
DNC mocks RNC for doing business while watching “lesbian bondage scenes”
By Jon Ward - The Daily Caller 03/31/10 at 2:51 PM

The back and forth between Democrats and Republicans over Voyeur-Gate continues. Earlier today, RNC spokesman Doug Heye sent out a list of DNC expenditures he said reporters would find “of interest.” The full list is at the bottom of this post.

That prompted a fiery response from DNC spokesman Hari Sevugan, who sent an e-mail to reporters saying the RNC was “flailing” and “desperate to change the subject” (although the cumulative effect of all this is that it does anything but change the subject).

“The DNC, unlike the RNC, does not conduct business while watching women engaged in lesbian bondage scenes,” Sevugan wrote.

The full Sevugan e-mail is here:

We can’t confirm that any of this is true – you’d have to check the FEC reports – which I would suggest you do after the fake memo issue on the Hill. But, assuming these expenses are true, you will notice – there are no expenses on here related to sex clubs. The DNC, unlike the RNC, does not conduct business while watching women engaged in lesbian bondage scenes.

We understand that RNC is desperate to change the subject, but pointing out ordinary expenses related to fundraising activities, including some from over a year ago, just comes off as flailing. Unlike RNC expenses for redecorating the Chairman’s office or table service at a bondage club, these expenses were not for personal use but for the actual functioning of the party and activities that added to the coffers rather than emptying them. Respecting and leveraging donor contributions rather than wasting them may be unusual for the dysfunctional fundraising shop at the RNC, but it shouldn’t be for a professional operation.

The RNC got in trouble not because it was doing traditional fundraising at hotels, or holding meetings at hotels, – and we’ve never raised that issue. They got in trouble with their donors because they are spending more money than they are raising (deficit spending is a pattern with Republicans) and because they are doing so in part at sex clubs.

Instead of spending their time pushing around examples of how the DNC efficiently spent money to catch up to them in fundraising and cash on hand, perhaps the RNC should spend their time scrutinizing their own books to weed out their Chairman’s profligate spending habits.

But, if Republicans want to compare our spending to their spending and allow us to say Michael Steele approved spending money at a Hollywood sex club a few more times – that’s fine with us.





Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/31/dnc-mocks-rnc-for-doing-business-while-watching-lesbian-bondage-scenes/#ixzz0jnPJJ2P0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R, with a hat tip to whatever DNC staffer(s) composed that superb response (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC