Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm sorry but on its face, taking a republican position and passing it over thier no votes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:32 AM
Original message
I'm sorry but on its face, taking a republican position and passing it over thier no votes
Seems like it's a little suboptimal in the strategy department.

Essentially that is what the Dems have been doing. If we have to pass stuff over no votes anyway, can we please apply core democratic values in what we pass?

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. There is no political party that represents me, none not even close anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
42. Green
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, according to one especially active poster this morning, your puzzlement
results from your not having attended Harvard and thus being unable to comprehend complex reasoning.

As I am likewise not a Harvard graduate, the decision seems pretty fucked up to me, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well please fill me in
I could use some entertainment this morning.

Similarly, I've been grooving on the up and down rec count, lol.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Apparently some colleges have great Pragmatism programs
I hear the final required class, How to Sleep at Night After Selling Out Everything You Once Believed In, really separates the posers from the hardcore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I hear that the best such program is at Cooper Union,
where they have many books that are over a 100 years old.

Is that true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
26. Thats the genius of Neo-* political philosophies
Edited on Thu Apr-01-10 10:51 AM by Moochy
Once enough people have died, you can bring back the regressive policies of the last century and call them post-partisan, new, pragmatic and centrist.

I hear Cooper Union has an online degree in GroupThink control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Yeah, and apparently every one else who graduated from Harvard and has a different
view must have been in the wrong classes there. Pope=Infallible=Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
23. That was an exemplary display of "Class Elitism".
I went to that school's site and searched for "tuition".
The response was, "If you have to ask...."

I now understand the devotee-like support for a Democratic Party Leadership that has assured the RICH Ownership Class that they will never know a day of discomfort, while telling the Working Class that we WILL be forced to compete with 3rd World Slave Labor for our jobs.

I worked my way through a Working Class State University in the late 60's, and considered myself fortunate to have been able to do so.

Unable to understand complex issues?
LOL.
There is NOTHING complex about "triangulation" and taking $MONEY$ for legislation beneficial to the donors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. I'm just shocked to learn that such an elite school doesn't teach English.
I thought that was a pretty basic subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. The President is a genius.
He is so far smarter than me. I questioned lots of stuff, but in the end he has made his doubters look foolish.
First President to get a major national health care bill passed. About to sign a historic arms agreement. Pulling troops out of Iraq. Has the opposing party in shambles. Saved the country from a depression. Regained the respect of the world for America.
We only look one or two moves ahead. The President is 10 or 20 moves ahead of us.
As for passing republican positions over their no votes, genius. Tell me how the Republicans are going to run against this man, let alone win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Bullshit.
It leaves too much on the table. What was the CBO score of HR676? I remember a few times that was supposed to happen.

Truman summed it up best, I'll paraphrase, given the choice between a real republican and a pretend republican, the voter always picks the real one. Now is a time to negotiate through strength and do what is best for the nation rather than whats best for wall street.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. letting the perfect or good be the enemy of adequate is ..............leaving a lot on the table
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. All I'm saying is that we need to start with all our options on the table.
Make the opposition figure out how to remove any given piece of it.

Are you seriously claiming this is the best we could have done?

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Name 2
He is so far smarter than me. I questioned lots of stuff, but in the end he has made his doubters look foolish.

Name 2, from the left that is.

First President to get a major national health care bill passed.

A major REPUBLICAN health INSURANCE bill passed (which was sorta the point of the OP). Single payer/public option/universal health CARE is still waiting. Did get the mandates in there and blocked negotiation on drug prices however, ya know the things he ran AGAINST.

About to sign a historic arms agreement.

Which is huge, don't get me wrong. It's kinda sad it got lost in the GOP health insurance reform. However, that's a relatively nonpartisan kinda accomplishment.

Pulling troops out of Iraq.

On the time table established by the SOFA written by Bush.

Has the opposing party in shambles.

Scott Brown on line 2.

Saved the country from a depression.

Through TARP funds (passed under Bush), and a bank bailout that he described as a "root canal". There were no "20 moves ahead" here. Heck the banks were 10 moves ahead of him, which is why he couldn't stop their big bonus plans.

Regained the respect of the world for America.

Yup. Well, apparently except for Israel.

We only look one or two moves ahead.

Got a mouse in your pocket? Speak for yourself.

The President is 10 or 20 moves ahead of us.

Ibid.

As for passing republican positions over their no votes, genius. Tell me how the Republicans are going to run against this man, let alone win?

Scott Brown is still waiting on line 2 for ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Line 2
MA democratic party ran Browns opponent, and they did get a pro-choice Republican that voted for the jobs bill. Also note another recent poll that shows his and Democratic candidates are pulling ahead in Ohio.
The big picture is that Obama has lots of accomplishments for only one year in office. Which Republican do you see beating him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Him?
No one. The left won't get a credible challenger and the GOP doesn't have much to challenge him with. To the original posters point, that isn't exactly an overwhelming testament to the strategy of passing GOP bills. It's a great way for the incumbent to "play defense", but it isn't much of a testament to achieving traditional democratic goals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
40. They don't have to beat him
he's joined them - if not in name, by actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. "Tell me how the Republicans are going to run against this man, let alone win?"
It's true, how can any Republican argue for their party agenda, when Obama so consistently cuts them off to claim it as his own. Of course, maybe the GOP can play that game too and tell Dem voters they'll embrace the old, discarded liberal agenda. They'll be lying, but at least we'll know it ahead of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. amazing...you win the blind obedience award for this month!
Congratulations!!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. damn, I was going for the
non-ideologue award.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. So that's what this is about?
Winning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Yes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. That's just wrong
But I know I'm speaking to the choir here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
24. If you don't care about policy, direction, ...
or the Real World effects of passing Republican legislation, then your post makes perfect sense.

OTOH, if you vote "Democratic" because you believe in "Democratic" values, then passing Republican Legislation is a deep betrayal.


"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans."---Paul Wellstone


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
29. Oh brother
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. There are 2 reasons...
why she is my favorite Food Network host :) Too bad my wife always runs me out of the room when Giada is on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. Tell me how the people win if he continuously adopts horrid Republiscum policy?
It doesn't matter if he wins if the price is working folks lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
35. How can you have a "union yes" avatar and tell me that this president
who went on national television and said a schoolful of teachers should be fired for not turning a school around -- when the state said the opposite -- is simply beyond me.

The Republicans will have no problem at all if this president doesn't remember who sent him to Washington in the first place. You don't have to be a genius to see that he's dinged just about every single membership of his coalition. A genius would ask his chief of staff to stop insulting his base.

I've love to see genius from this president. Now.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
41. Is this intended as a joke? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. how about taking a republican position then
twisting some of the interior work, adding regulations, rules and requirements that limits damage and such that also makes it more in tune with democratic values?

That seems like a sensible approach to me if one is almost required to take such a position to gain a few vital votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. Why bother? If you won't get any bipartisan support for ANYTHING?
Why dilute progress and change for people who have no intention to even consider any legislation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. It is not the bipartisan support that is stopping
the liberal agenda. It is the blue dogs.
Now if by appearing moderate and flexible the President gets a real majority in congress and wins a second term, all would be possible. To have lost because of 10 or 20 blue dogs would burn the bridge behind him. Being unable to pass anything would not help Dems in any election. Now he has them right where he wants them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. LOL
When the Prez pushes legislation the GOP used to run on, the problem is at a higher pay grade than blue dogs on the Hill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. which vital votes?
teabaggers? congressional repubs didn't cast a vote for this crap bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. Best post of the year!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
20. Its GENIUS if you are a follower of @LeoStrauss
Edited on Thu Apr-01-10 10:19 AM by Moochy
Yes We Can Stay The Course!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
28. That's one small-minded perspective
...that can only be supported with a pre-conditioned mind. I leave mine open for input...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. And yet you offer no rebuttal
Beneath you I suppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. It's taken me a year to arrive at this position
The old fashioned way, empirically.

So exactly how am I small minded and pre-conditioned?

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. It's taken me 30 years to refine my position on politics
I don't find myself easily swayed by a single position or vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
34. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC