Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP Congressional Candidate Courts Tea Party with Anti-Government Rhetoric, Receives $200,000 Annual

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 02:15 PM
Original message
GOP Congressional Candidate Courts Tea Party with Anti-Government Rhetoric, Receives $200,000 Annual



Steve Benen highlights yet another example of KEEP YOUR GUBMINT HANDS OFF MY GUBMINT WELFARE syndrome.

But for one important detail, Stephen Fincher could be a perfect “tea party” candidate: a gospel-singing cotton farmer from this tiny hamlet in western Tennessee, seeking to right the listing ship of Washington with a commitment to lower taxes and smaller government.

The detail? Fincher accepts roughly $200,000 in farm subsidies each year.

That’s right, just like Michele Bachmann. And really, this is perfectly consistent with the way most Teabaggers think.

Fincher says he wants to “fight government encroachment in our lives” and opposes “any attempt to increase government intervention in our health care” and thinks that the solution to all our problems is “the free market.”

But that $200 grand he gets every year from the gubmint? He’ll keep that, thanks very much.

And the rubes are lapping it up

http://firedoglake.com/2010/04/02/gop-congressional-candidate-courts-tea-party-with-anti-government-rhetoric-receives-200000-annually-in-government-handouts/

We need the AG dept to post a report listing the names of everyone getting farm subsides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Those farm subsidies aren't provided automatically.
He had to make an application for it. And agree to follow the requirements for the subsidies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. How do these people explain inconsistencies like that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Democrats need to end cotton subsidies, period.
Sugar too.

I'd bet 95% of those plantation owners are hard-core 'conservatives'. Why we keep subsidizing them is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC