Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Jobs Mirage: The People Need $1 Trillion More Now

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 10:49 AM
Original message
The Jobs Mirage: The People Need $1 Trillion More Now
from the WorkingLife blog:



The Jobs Mirage: The People Need $1 Trillion More Now
by Jonathan Tasini

Friday 02 of April, 2010


The danger in a blip of good news is that it's simply that: a blip. It is certainly a good thing that the data shows that 162,000 jobs were added in March. But, the truth is that this is not much to celebrate. And it actually should be a siren to move dramatically to embrace a much more ambitious jobs program on the order of $1 trillion.

Here is the grim math, and it is laid out quite well in a briefing paper by the Economic Policy Institute. Because my EPI friends are a bit wonky even for me, let me cut to the basics: we are in deep, deep trouble.

The key point in the EPI analysis:

The U.S .economy has lost 8.4 million jobs since the recession began, while it should have added 2.7 million jobs simply to keep up with population growth. This means the labor market is now roughly 11.1 million jobs below what would be needed to restore the pre-recession unemployment rate.


And the EPI folks point out correctly that the numbers don't reflect at least two other points:

First, a whole lot of people who gave up looking for work, and therefore aren't counted among the 9.7 "steady" unemployment rate, will flow back into the labor market this year as they read the political analysis that the job market is improving. That will actually hike the unemployment rate.

Second, there is just a basic fact that has changed. Employers used to think--gee, I have these great workers and, yes, it's a recession but I am going to hang on to as many workers as I can because when the recession ends, I want to be back in swing with these workers and it will cost me more to find the workers I want and train them to do the work that my great workers do now. ...............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.workinglife.org/blogs/view_post.php?content_id=14785




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. More blather from an unsuccessful fringe candidate
Edited on Sat Apr-03-10 11:12 AM by Freddie Stubbs
Edited for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "from an unsuccessful from candidate"
Repetez en anglais, s'il vous plait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtuck004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. Might be blather, but the facts are spot on. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. K & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. 16.9% unemployment among the "under-employed"
Edited on Sat Apr-03-10 12:22 PM by amborin
"This morning’s release of the Bureau of Labor Statistics employment report showed 162,000 payroll jobs gained in March, the largest jump in three years. However, of these, 48,000 were directly created by the federal government to assist with the 2010 Decennial Census. Excluding Census hiring, state and local government shed 9,000 jobs, while the private sector added 123,000 jobs. Some of these gains were likely an upward correction to the winter-storm-dampened February payrolls, but the trend since January is positive, with the private sector adding an average of 65,500 jobs per month over the last two months. However, as nearly 400,000 workers entered or re-entered the labor market in March, the increase in payroll jobs was not enough to move the dial on unemployment, which held steady at 9.7%.

It is important to note that for the next few months, Census hiring will likely be buffeting around month-to-month employment changes, as the number of temporary Census jobs showing up in payrolls may peak at over 600,000 in May, and then decline to near zero by the fall.

While the unemployment rate held steady at 9.7% in March, the long-term unemployment situation deteriorated. In March, an additional 414,000 unemployed workers crossed the six-months-unemployed threshold, so that now there 6.5 million workers who have been unemployed for longer than six months. The average unemployment spell was 31.2 weeks, the median unemployment spell was 20 weeks, and 44.1% of all unemployed workers had been unemployed for over six months.

The “underemployment rate” (which includes not just the officially unemployed, but also jobless workers who have given up looking for work and part-time workers who want full-time jobs) also rose, from 16.8% to 16.9%, as the number of involuntary part-timers increased by 263,000 workers. However, the number of “marginally attached” workers — jobless workers who have given up looking for work, declined by 209,000, likely because many marginally attached workers entered or re-entered the labor force, which increased by 398,000 in March. In March, there were 2.3 million marginally attached workers, 9.1 million involuntary part-timers, and 15.0 million unemployed workers in the United States, for a total of 26.4 million workers who are either unemployed or underemployed.

Since the start of the recession in December 2007, the labor market has shed 8.2 million payroll jobs. This number, however, understates the size of the gap in the labor market by failing to take into account the fact that simply to keep up with population growth, the labor market should have added around 2.8 million jobs since December 2007. This means the labor market is now roughly 11 million jobs below what would restore the pre-recession unemployment rate (which was 5.0% in December 2007). To get us back to the lower unemployment rate that existed prior to the 2001 recession (4.3% in March 2001), the U.S. economy is now nearly 17 million jobs short.

Furthermore, thesecalculations understate slack in the labor market by failing to take into account the decline in hours worked for those who have kept their jobs. At the start of the recession in December 2007, the length of the average workweek in the private sector was 34.7 hours. In March, it was 34.0 hours. This may at first seem like a small amount, but when multiplied across the labor market, the effect is nontrivial—the decline in the total number of hours worked in the private sector since the start of the recession that is due to reduced hours alone (i.e., not job loss) is equivalent to 2.2 million jobs.

snip

http://www.epi.org/publications/entry/jobs_picture_20100402/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Party like it's 1929 !!
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC