Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin Family Values

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 06:25 AM
Original message
Palin Family Values
Sarah and Tawd: Lawd only knows what crimes and other offenses they have committed.

Track - Vandalism (hard to nail this down but where there's smoke there's Sarah)
Bristol - Unwed mother (usually a personal matter unless you and your mother insist on abstinence and being moral arbitrators for the world)
Willow - Gang leader
Piper - Unknown (Don't let her fool you. She has spent more time at her mother's side than the others. Who knows what her future will be?)
Trig - The only innocent one in the whole bunch
Tripp - Unknown (He needs to be raised by wolves who have more ethics. Levi might do if he would settle down.)

If they were prosecuted, the RICO laws might apply. They are grifters of the first order. The Travelers are shamed by the Palins' shenanigans. They would make her Queen if she would join them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. go after sarah, or todd
but I see no reason to drag the kids into it, even if they have had some problems in the past.

tacky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Track chose military service over doing time. Adult, fair game.
Bristol jumped on the abstinance only bandwagon when her actions were patently at odds with the message she preaches. She joined the game.

Willow. From what I've seen there have been no attacks on her, just a statement of her actions. All attacks have been against her mother, and the steps she took to keep her own name being dragged through the mud. Rather stupid in my opinion, RW media would have studiously ignored the whole matter and if Willow did get a comeupance (however minor) would have given Sarah the moral high ground from which to righteously decry any mention of the matter from the left.

Pipper and the boys? I can see the tongue in cheek even if you can't. However, I do fear that Pipper might well decide to follow in the footsteps of both her sisters in order to deliver a big healthy "FUCK YOU MOMMY!" to Sarah.


Whilst the children are being mentioned as examples, the attack here is very directly aimed at their parents and Sarah in particular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. as I said
tacky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. And Have We Heard Anything About Willow???
Generally I think a politicians kids are out of bounds...they didn't chose to be born into the circus of the body politic, but that also assumes most candidates will do their best to shelter their children from that limelight and leave them some privacy. However, when said politician uses their children as props...claims to be the "supermom" and attempts to tell us how we should live our private lives then the line has been crossed.

Imagine if Al Gore's son had been involved in the ransacking of a vacant house and had daddy use his political clout to cover it up...the wingnuts would howl endlessly and the corporate media would become fixated. Yet I still haven't seen/heard a major "news" outlet mention about this situation.

Anyone else seen anything????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. the line was crossed by the parent . . . not by the kids
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. +1!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. I can't say I blame teenagers when they have a mother like Sarah
Sorry, but if her private persona is anywhere close to her public persona I really wonder that they don't act out a hell of a lot more. Look at the example she's giving them. Be a quitter. Lie and do and say outrageous things to get attention. Smear your opponents. Make as much money doing all the above as you can. Take care of the kid while I parade all of you out there so I can talk about family values.

I can't bring myself to trash Sarah's children. They've done nothing millions of kids across the country don't do now or in the past. I actually feel sorry for them. I hope they don't follow in her footsteps for their sakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
era veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. Queen of the Travelers, perfect
We can seal your driveway, you betcha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Island Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. Blame the parents, not the kids.
I work with at-risk kids and nine times out of ten whatever trouble they get into is a result of crappy parenting. Many times the parents get so caught up in their own shit that the fail to take notice of their children. I'm guessing that's the case with the Palin kids. They have two parents, neither of which give a damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. And both parents seem to be narcissistic too
Anyone who has ever been around a narcissist in their family knows how fucking fucked up that can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. The Aristocrats !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. LOL!
Now go to your room!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
13. I can't understand why the people who owned the house
didn't take her to court and bring it out in the open. They can't be that afraid of that out and out bi**ch Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secondwind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. Nancy Pelosi had five children and she raised them right. Now, compare the Pelosi children


to Sarah's bunch

Nancy's children:

Daughter: Nancy Corinne Pelosi (hotel executive)
Daughter: Christine Pelosi (former chief of staff for Rep John Tierney)
Daughter: Jacqueline Pelosi Kenneally (runs an art school for children)... See More
Son: Paul Pelosi Jr. (President of San Francisco's Commission on the Environment)
Daughter: Alexandra Pelosi (documentary filmmaker)

Sarah's children:

Track - juvenile delinquent, spray-painted schoolbuses, got caught, shipped off to Iraq on 9/11/08. No college

Briston - unwed mother, drugs and alcohol, no college.

Willow - drugs and alcohol, breaking and entering, trashing a home, no college.

Piper - too soon to tell

Trig - a little angel

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC