Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New York Denies Indian Point a Water Permit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 07:17 AM
Original message
New York Denies Indian Point a Water Permit

Keith Myers/The New York Times

New York State has denied a water-quality certification sought by the Indian Point plant's owner.
By DAVID M. HALBFINGER
Published: April 3, 2010

In a major victory for environmental advocates, New York State has ruled that outmoded cooling technology at the Indian Point nuclear power plant kills so many Hudson River fish, and consumes and contaminates so much water, that it violates the federal Clean Water Act.

The decision is a blow to the plant’s owner, the Entergy Corporation, which now faces the prospect of having to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to build stadium-size cooling towers, or risk that Indian Point’s two operating reactors — which supply 30 percent of the electricity used by New York City and Westchester County — could be forced to shut down.

Entergy officials said that they were “disappointed” in the ruling and that they might fight it in court. The original federal licenses for the two 1970s-era reactors expire in 2013 and 2015, and a water quality certificate is a prerequisite for a 20-year renewal by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. But a prolonged appeal in New York could delay a shutdown, Diane Screnci, a spokeswoman for the commission, said late Saturday.

<snip>

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/04/nyregion/04indian.html

An Entergy spokesman said that converting Indian Point’s cooling system would cost $1.1 billion and would require shutting both reactors down entirely for 42 weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good. Let it shut down and have the state/someone create wind turbine farms to replace it.
Edited on Sun Apr-04-10 08:14 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
I live 15 minutes by car from Indian Point and don't trust it in the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I live even closer - however 30% of NYC and Westchesters electricity won't be supplied by a windfarm
not with the price of land in Westchester
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. And 2013 is way too soon to roll out a big grid change like that
What's infuriating is that they should have been planning this out, oh, 20 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. There are a lot of Catholic church owned properties that are right on the Westchester/Putnam
Edited on Sun Apr-04-10 12:01 PM by OmmmSweetOmmm
side of the Hudson. Waterfront property, no less. Maybe a deal could be made? lol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Would require both reactors to be shut down for 42 weeks?
Is that the best they can do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. good - hope they stand firm on this decision


people in that area should start doing some smart thinking and acting about how to acquire electricity without the nuke plant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. They'll get it by burning more coal...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC