Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lack of breastfeeding costs lives, billions of dollars

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 11:21 AM
Original message
Lack of breastfeeding costs lives, billions of dollars
Of course, this means extended maternity leave, but the fight for that would be good practice for overthrowing our Corporate Masters.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/04/05/breastfeeding.costs/?hpt=T2

Study: Lack of breastfeeding costs lives, billions of dollars

(CNN) -- If most new moms would breastfeed their babies for the first six months of life, it would save nearly 1,000 lives and billions of dollars each year, according to a new study published Monday in the journal Pediatrics.

"The United States incurs $13 billion in excess costs annually and suffers 911 preventable deaths per year because our breastfeeding rates fall far below medical recommendations," the report said.

The World Health Organization says infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life "to achieve optimal growth, development and health." The WHO is not alone in its recommendations.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention all agree that breast milk alone is sufficient for newborns and infants until they are 6 months old.

However, a 2009 breastfeeding report card from the CDC found that only 74 percent of women start breastfeeding, only 33 percent were still exclusively breastfeeding at three months and only 14 percent were still exclusively breastfeeding at six months.

Dr. Melissa Bartick, one of the new study's co-authors, says the vast majority of extra costs incurred each year could be saved "if 80 to 90 percent of women exclusively breastfed for as little as four months and if 90 percent of women would breastfeed some times until six months." Bartick is a hospitalist -- a doctor who specializes in the care of hospitalized patients -- at Cambridge Health Alliance, an instructor in medicine at Harvard Medical School and a mother of two.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Its a little easier to breastfeed if a country provides paid maternity leave
No wonder the rates drop off so quick. Women are hurried back to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Laissez les enfants manger au Jardin Olive
Edited on Mon Apr-05-10 11:49 AM by MineralMan
Je dis seulement...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. From where does he derive the $10.56 million per child?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. You figure they are just accounting for the dead ones?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I honestly don't know
I'm trying to figure out where the figure comes from, the article doesn't explain it very well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. My assumption is they are trying to also account for sicknesses that could be preventable
Just a guess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Apparently, most of the figure comes from the "lost wages" of the purported dead child.
I can get a hard copy of the actual published report at work sometime soon, and I'll try to clarify that question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. even if they breast fed for several weeks it would help the health of the baby


that's what breasts are for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. And the mother.
Breastfeeding reduces breast cancer risk for the long term (and the longer you breastfeed the greater the protective effect,) and greatly increases the mother's health in the postpartum period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bingo! It says 911 preventable deaths. Let it go as that and big bucks will follow.
Mom's milk knows better than cow's milk!

We are,after all, mammals.

911 is the magic number in the USA for unquestioned funding out the wazoo, BTW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. There's no "cow's milk" in formula...
FYI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yes there is, unless it's soy formula.
The regular stuff is based on milk from cows, which is heated to break the proteins down somewhat, then some fats and vitamins and corn syrup and god knows what else are added. The hypoallergenic stuff breaks the proteins down more, but it's still either cow's milk based or soy based.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. ah, learned something new...nothing like the milk out of the cow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. too many choices today...
between smoking threads and breastfeeding threads, all that is lacking is an anti-vax thread, and we'll hit the trifecta!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. There hasn't been a circumcision thread lately...
Those can get kinda hinky...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. yeah, people get snippy at each other in those. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. You are very, very bad...
Here :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. heh heh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. Moms need TIME with their babies in order to feed them
Edited on Mon Apr-05-10 03:26 PM by SoCalDem
If Mom is schlepping the baby to daycare and using her day at work, it's hard to feed the baby herself.

Breastfeeding is about more than pumping milk into a bottle at breaktime.


It's about supply & demand, and finding the rhythm between Mom & baby. That requires TIME with the baby..24-7.

Most modern Moms cannot choose to stay home with their babies.

The irony is that so many of the last generation of women who DID have time with their babies, were conned into thinking that "modern Mothers" should use formula..

Many Moms during the 50's & 60's chose formula because clever marketers convinced them it was "better" for their babies:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC