walldude
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-10 11:36 AM
Original message |
2 tons of oil spilled onto Great Barrier Reef.. |
|
Edited on Mon Apr-05-10 11:37 AM by walldude
http://www1.voanews.com/english/news/asia/Chinese-Oil-Spill-Threatens-Australias-Great-Barrier-Reef-89916382.htmlAustralian officials warn that the Great Barrier Reef is in grave danger of being further contaminated by oil after a Chinese ship ran aground off Queensland. The vessel is stuck on a sandbar and has already leaked at least two tons of dark sludge into the water.
A frantic clean-up operation is under way where the Chinese-registered coal ship, Shen Neng 1, is aground in an area where commercial shipping is restricted to protect the world's largest coral reef.
About two tons of oil has seeped into the water so far from the damaged vessel, creating a slick up to three kilometers long.And there is another 950 tons that could still leak out. But it's ok.. that place was a dump anyway. :eyes:
|
ensho
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message |
OneTenthofOnePercent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-10 12:02 PM
Response to Original message |
2. This is about 75 cubic feet or 11 barrels of oil! (n/t) |
|
Edited on Mon Apr-05-10 12:02 PM by OneTenthofOnePercent
|
jody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-10 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Agree, 11 barrels seems like a trivial amount compared to the Exxon Valdez oil spill. n/t |
walldude
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-10 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Right.. according to the article the spill is 3 miles long |
|
Edited on Mon Apr-05-10 12:15 PM by walldude
by 300 feet wide, yeah it's nothing to worry about. :crazy:
The reef stretches for more than 2,500 kilometers along Australia's northeast coast. It covers an area bigger than the United Kingdom and is largest living structure on earth. It is home to hundreds of thousands of species of marine life, many of which are rare.
But it's ok, a few tons of fucking oil won't do anything, I mean it's not as bad as the Valdez... yet
|
jody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-10 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. How thick is a film of oil 300' x 3 miles from 11 barrels of oil? I agree oil spills are bad but the |
|
OP spill is hardly a major disaster.
|
HillbillyBob
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. It does not take a lot of oil to kill Corals |
|
and we are losing coral around the world at a very large pace. They produce habitat and oxygen for feeder fish that are eaten by larger fish that in turn are eaten by us. The point is we are breaking our food chain down.
Plus the Valdese spill is still affecting the populations of the area because it still has not been cleaned up.
|
DCBob
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. If the oil doesnt kill them, global warming surely will |
|
This is sickening. Hopefully the whole load does not spill.
|
walldude
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. Not to mention that the GBR is the biggest coral deposit on the |
|
planet. Coral is in only 1% of the ocean but is home to 25% of the oceans species. This is not good already.
Hey thanks for the reply, after reading responses about how it's "only 11 barrels" and is "not so bad" I thought I mistakenly landed in freeperville.
|
OneTenthofOnePercent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. 2 tons spilled over an area of 0.170 sq.mi. (300' x 3mi)... the film will be .000189" |
jody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. Human hair is about 0.003" so the film would be about 1/15 as thick as a hair? Thanks n/t |
amborin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-05-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:12 PM
Response to Original message |